With Johnson
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:11 pmDo we have a better chance of getting DeSoto RB Cyrus Gray?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:11 pmPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:14 pmGood question... I have no idea... he could be a real star with his offense
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:14 pmI wouldn't mind seeing Chris Butler in his offense.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:25 pmmustang91 wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing Chris Butler in his offense.
It would be nice to finally lineup and watch McKinney ripping open a hole with DMart or Butler crashing in behind him.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:28 pmDo WRs become afterthoughts in that offense?
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:39 pmIs it a foregone conclusion that if Johnson takes the job that he will install the triple option "flexbone" offense?
He was the OC at Hawaii and there they ran a spread offense.
He was the OC at Hawaii and there they ran a spread offense.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:42 pmIs it a foregone conclusion that Paul Johnson's our coach? Fran was our coach yesterday.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:44 pmAlaric wrote:Is it a foregone conclusion that Paul Johnson's our coach? Fran was our coach yesterday.
And Chan Gailey before that.
And Kragthorpe before that.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:46 pmI'll wait to see a PC but I am hearing Monday...
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:46 pmNote that I am not getting a name out of them, just a date... i am NOT claiming its PJ, though I hope so
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:05 pmSMU will not be able to recruit highly touted Passing QBs, RBs, or WRs if they run that offense. I speak from years of experience. Top RBs will be unsatisfied with 10-12 carries a game. Top WRs don't get enough passes. Top Passing QBs don't want to run the ball. SMU might be able get good running QBs who are for the most part ignored by most program. Rarely will they be run/pass threats. Cyrus Gray will not give SMU a second look.
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:11 pmStallion wrote:SMU will not be able to recruit highly touted Passing QBs, RBs, or WRs if they run that offense. I speak from years of experience. Top RBs will be unsatisfied with 10-12 carries a game. Top WRs don't get enough passes. Top Passing QBs don't want to run the ball. SMU might be able get good running QBs who are for the most part ignored by most program. Rarely will they be run/pass threats. Cyrus Gray will not give SMU a second look.
Why? Isn't Cyrus being recruited as a RB?
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:22 pmStallion wrote:SMU will not be able to recruit highly touted Passing QBs, RBs, or WRs if they run that offense. I speak from years of experience. Top RBs will be unsatisfied with 10-12 carries a game. Top WRs don't get enough passes. Top Passing QBs don't want to run the ball. SMU might be able get good running QBs who are for the most part ignored by most program. Rarely will they be run/pass threats. Cyrus Gray will not give SMU a second look.
What are your 'years of experience.'?
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:45 pmWhile I appreciate Stallions years of experience, I will go with PJ on this one.
1997: 10-3
1998: 14-1
1999: 13-2
2000: 13-2
2001: 12-2
2002: 2-10 (first year at navy, and half of his victories were against SMU)
2003: 8-5
2004: 10-2
2005: 8-4
2006: 9-4
2007: 7-4 (with one game left to play)
And this statement "SMU will not be able to recruit highly touted Passing QBs, RBs, or WRs if they run that offense" makes it seem like we do recruit highly touted recruits right now.....
1997: 10-3
1998: 14-1
1999: 13-2
2000: 13-2
2001: 12-2
2002: 2-10 (first year at navy, and half of his victories were against SMU)
2003: 8-5
2004: 10-2
2005: 8-4
2006: 9-4
2007: 7-4 (with one game left to play)
And this statement "SMU will not be able to recruit highly touted Passing QBs, RBs, or WRs if they run that offense" makes it seem like we do recruit highly touted recruits right now.....