Page 1 of 2

Bobby Ross

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:25 pm
by Dwan
Won a national title at Georgia Tech, took the chargers to the super bowl....but could not win at Army even with the huge recruiting advantage the service academies have...

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:28 pm
by PonyDoh
He also won something like 5 ACC titles at Maryland

He's no Gary Gibbs, though

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:49 pm
by smupony94
How do the service academies have huge advantages? Seems like they have a limited pool of recruits - smart, athletic ones, but a smaller pool

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:53 pm
by Pony94
I agree...service acadamies do not have a recruiting advantage. Would some one please correct me if I am wrong, but in order to attend a service academy, do you not have to have a letter of recommendation from some one holding a political office. I think that immediately narrows the pool of recruiting candidates.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:54 pm
by StangEsq
i think that was supposed to be a joke

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:55 pm
by RushStPony
He was being sarcastic.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:55 pm
by Pony94
this board is going down the tubes...nothing can be believed...its all a joke....guess that's why Stallion is king.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:56 pm
by smupony94
Ok, I see that now. Went right past me.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:57 pm
by Stallion
They can run 350 players through their Academy and Varsity Rosters during a 4 year period. That's about 15 players for every position on the field. When you are recruiting sleepers anyway(like 3/4th of SMU recruits) it is better to recruit 350 sleepers and weed out the players. Otherwise, you subscribe to the magic pixie dust theory to explain 23 Academy Bowls since SMU last went to a Bowl.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:57 pm
by Pony Soup
Kind of like my offer for tickets to OU/Mizzou?

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:08 pm
by Dwan
but how come a coach like Bobby Ross could not win with being able to have a roster of 160 kids?

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:14 pm
by Stallion
probably because Army doesn't and never has had as good a Model as Air Force and Navy. More often than not an Academy team goes bowling-it is not the miracle you people seem to claim. Dig a little deeper.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:19 pm
by Pony Soup
Stallion wrote:probably because Army doesn't and never has had as good a Model as Air Force and Navy. More often than not an Academy team goes bowling-it is not the miracle you people seem to claim. Dig a little deeper.



I think what you are trying to say, is that Air Force and Navy have hotter models than Army... And hopefully they're all blondes

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:22 pm
by KnuckleStang
Stallion wrote:They can run 350 players through their Academy and Varsity Rosters during a 4 year period. That's about 15 players for every position on the field. When you are recruiting sleepers anyway(like 3/4th of SMU recruits) it is better to recruit 350 sleepers and weed out the players. Otherwise, you subscribe to the magic pixie dust theory to explain 23 Academy Bowls since SMU last went to a Bowl.


You know better than I do that Air Force is in a different situation than Army/Navy, and therefore have no place in your argument. So you can cut your "Academy bowl count" by about three fourths.

I highly recommend Fienstien's excellent book "Army vs. Navy," which explores this topic in some detail.

Only coaches in the modern era to put together consistent wins/bowls at Navy are George Welsh (considered "unsexy" and "boring to recruits" and went on to 17 straight 7+ win seasons at Virginia in the ACC), and Paul Johnson. At Army, Bobby Ross couldn't make it happen. And we all know how sorry a coach he is.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:25 pm
by Stallion
No it is not-Air Force was the first to utilize this Model of agressively using their Prep Schools to feed their Varsity Rosters. Navy implemented the same Model with a direct intention of copying what Air Force was doing because they were getting the crap beat out of them each year. Dig a little deeper. I posted an article a few months ago quoting Navy officials that they intentionally adopted the Air Force Model in the late 90s.