And now we have this to worry about . . .

by **PonyTime** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:04 pm

Another HC opening in D1 to compete with that might be pretty attractive:

Navy

by **Mustang1991** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:08 pm

Be positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job

by **SMU89** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:14 pm

Mustang1991 wrote:Be positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job

Really? Are you using new math?

Before:

2 Vacancies (SMU & GT)

Now:

2 Vacancies (SMU & Navy)

by **Mustang1991** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:18 pm

SMU89 wrote:
Mustang1991 wrote:Be positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job

Really? Are you using new math?

Before:

2 Vacancies (SMU & GT)

Now:

2 Vacancies (SMU & Navy)

Let me clarify: there are not any additional attractive jobs for SMU to compete with. The GT hire cancels out the Navy vacancy.

by **SMU89** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:21 pm

Got it. Zero sum game.

No news on Arkansas?

Hope we don't start butting heads with them in round two.

by **Dutch** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:23 pm

i think this isn't a zero sum equation. i would much prefer to compete with Navy than with GT for a coach. the navy job is much less attractive to a potential coach. they almost have to go after a coordinator or DIAA

And now we have this to worry about . . .

And now we have this to worry about . . .

Who is online