And now we have this to worry about . . .
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:04 pmAnother HC opening in D1 to compete with that might be pretty attractive:
Navy
Navy
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:04 pmPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:08 pmBe positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:14 pmMustang1991 wrote:Be positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job
Really? Are you using new math?
Before:
2 Vacancies (SMU & GT)
Now:
2 Vacancies (SMU & Navy)
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:18 pmSMU89 wrote:Mustang1991 wrote:Be positive: there's also one fewer since GT filled its job
Really? Are you using new math?
Before:
2 Vacancies (SMU & GT)
Now:
2 Vacancies (SMU & Navy)
Let me clarify: there are not any additional attractive jobs for SMU to compete with. The GT hire cancels out the Navy vacancy.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:21 pmGot it. Zero sum game.
No news on Arkansas?
Hope we don't start butting heads with them in round two.
No news on Arkansas?
Hope we don't start butting heads with them in round two.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:23 pmi think this isn't a zero sum equation. i would much prefer to compete with Navy than with GT for a coach. the navy job is much less attractive to a potential coach. they almost have to go after a coordinator or DIAA