Page 1 of 2
My Revised Top 5
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:23 pmby that's great raplh
1 Turner
2 Todd Dodge
3 bowden
4 chow
5 barnett
anyone on that list would be miles ahead of PB (no offense, phil)
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:32 pmby Kiper
1 June Jones
2 Turner Gill (even though he's not coming)
3 Slick Rick Neuheisel (ditto)
4 Chan Gailey
4 Terry Bowden
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:59 pmby mustang1108
1. bowden
2. shula
3. applewhite
4. barnett
5. gailey
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:03 pmby mr. pony
1. Spurrier (Blow it up!!!!!)
2. Bowden
3. Neuheisel
4. Barnett
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:08 pmby Hoop Fan
of the realistic possibilities:
1. Barnett
2. Gill
3 Bowden
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:29 pmby PonyDoh
1) Barnett
2) Rick Neuheisel
3) June Jones
4)Turner Gill
5) Bowden
6) Todd Dodge
7) Mike Locksley
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:43 pmby Hoop Fan
PonyDoh wrote:1) Barnett
2) Rick Neuheisel
3) June Jones
4)Turner Gill
5) Bowden
6) Todd Dodge
7) Mike Locksley
Jones is unrealistic, and Locksley has a New Years Day game to worry about. Any of the others though.
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:58 pmby SMUstang
I'd go with:
1) Gary Barnett
2) Terry Bowden
3) Mike Shula
4) Rick Neuheisel
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:58 pmby SMUstang
SMUstang wrote:I'd go with:
1) Gary Barnett
2) Terry Bowden
3) Mike Shula
4) Rick Neuheisel
No TCU retreads
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:23 pmby PonyDoh
Hoop Fan wrote:PonyDoh wrote:1) Barnett
2) Rick Neuheisel
3) June Jones
4)Turner Gill
5) Bowden
6) Todd Dodge
7) Mike Locksley
Jones is unrealistic, and Locksley has a New Years Day game to worry about. Any of the others though.
Locksley has been looking to leave Illinois the last two years. I know for a fact, he's put out feelers for lateral moves, just b/c he hates Champagne. He'd recruit like a beast.
I only included Jones b/c he's been mentioned as a candidate, and he'd be a good hire, despite there being no way he'd come
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:28 pmby PonyDogg
This thread is unproductive and does not matter.
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:29 pmby BRStang
PonyDogg wrote:This thread is unproductive and does not matter.
Right. Let's get back to our productive threads.
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:31 pmby PonyDogg
BRStang wrote:PonyDogg wrote:This thread is unproductive and does not matter.
Right. Let's get back to our productive threads.
Good point.
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:31 pmby PonyDogg
PonyDogg wrote:BRStang wrote:PonyDogg wrote:This thread is unproductive and does not matter.
Right. Let's get back to our productive threads.
Good point.
However, this one matters the least. We are the only ones reading it.
Posted:
Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:33 pmby J.T.supporta
PonyDogg wrote:PonyDogg wrote:BRStang wrote:PonyDogg wrote:This thread is unproductive and does not matter.
Right. Let's get back to our productive threads.
Good point.
However, this one matters the least. We are the only ones reading it.
wrong, im reading it too