Page 1 of 2
Norm says he sees it as Fran and Coker

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:27 pm
by Junior
Doesn't think Fran would be a long-term hire due to history of puddle-jumping.

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:28 pm
by The Purple Hippo
link? quote? article?

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:29 pm
by Dutch
The Purple Hippo wrote:link? quote? article?
1310a.m.
or go to theticket.com he's still talking about it.

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:29 pm
by Junior
He's currently discussing on the Ticket.

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:32 pm
by The Purple Hippo
theyre talking about steroids now

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:33 pm
by Dutch
The Purple Hippo wrote:theyre talking about steroids now
you were too late.
gotta act fast to catch an SMU discussion on the airwaves. they come and go quick.

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:34 pm
by The Purple Hippo

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:41 pm
by The Purple Hippo
OMG I CAN WIN A FORD TAURUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just make a donation! and you get a chance to win!!!

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:43 pm
by cs09viking
The Purple Hippo wrote:OMG I CAN WIN A FORD TAURUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just make a donation! and you get a chance to win!!!
i would rather win a free whataburger at the norm-a-thon!

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:46 pm
by The Purple Hippo
reminds me of that part in Employee of the Month where the guy gets excited about possibly winning a used Chevy Malibu


Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:56 pm
by Nacho
Fran was at NM for 6 years and then took the TCU job.
TCU for 3 years and got the chance to coach at Alabama which anyone in the WAC would have taken.
Went to A&M when he found out about all of the infractions at Alabama.
That may be puddle-jumping to Norm but to me it is the typical thing you see with all coaches who want to move up the ladder.
Have you guys ever looked at the resumes of coaches. They drive moving vans instead of cars.

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:47 pm
by mrydel
Bennett stayed for 6 years. Time on the job does not = success. Less time on the job is more likely an indicator of success.
Wouldn't it be nice 2 years from now to hear the coach search blogs stating that "the once dead SMU program, now flourishing, is a dream job for coaches nationwide"?

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:56 pm
by friarwolf
I would settle for us having a spirited debate in 5 years about whether our coach who replaced Fran should get all the credit for leading us to another 10 win season or if he is simply winning with Fran's recruits..............

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:31 pm
by Junior
mrydel wrote:Bennett stayed for 6 years. Time on the job does not = success. Less time on the job is more likely an indicator of success.
Wouldn't it be nice 2 years from now to hear the coach search blogs stating that "the once dead SMU program, now flourishing, is a dream job for coaches nationwide"?
I think we're more likely to here "The SMU coach search now enters week 112. Steve Orsini is now looking at the possibility of outsourcing the coaching job to India."

Posted:
Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:53 pm
by The XtC
[quote="Nacho"]
Went to A&M when he found out about all of the infractions at Alabama.
[/quote]
No, went to A&M when they offered him more. Everyone knew about Alabama's NCAA problems before he got there.