Page 1 of 1
obligatory "if wake forest can, why can't we" thread

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:19 pm
by that's great raplh

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:22 pm
by perunapower
Because they have Jim Grobe (or any coach for that matter) and we don't.


Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:24 pm
by that's great raplh
we got a WOW coming around the mountain

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:25 pm
by QuikSStang
don't they have more students too? and theyre in the ACC

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 pm
by SMUBob
WF has about 4,000 undergraduate students, so about 2/3 the size of SMU. But they are in a BCS conference.
Wake is a great model for the private schools. Other than USC, BC and maybe Miami, who can you name with more recent success? Among the BCS players, certainly not: Notre Dame, Stanford, Northwestern, Vandy, Baylor, Duke, Syracuse.
From the outside, it would appear they are doing it the "right" way, also. Long term commitment to a solid coach who redshirts everybody. Two solid years in a row improves the recruiting and they are able to ride the "virtuous cycle" so long as they can keep Grobe. Now you'd have to say Wake is set up to be a perennial upper division ACC program. How cool is that?
But it's helped a great deal that Florida State has weakened dramatically in the last few years, and that none of the North Carolina schools has a decent program going on right now.

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm
by Italian Mustang
And we don't run the "orbit" offense.

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:55 pm
by mrydel
Italian Mustang wrote:And we don't run the "orbit" offense.
Correct. Our was the "obit".

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:05 pm
by smupony94
mrydel wrote:Italian Mustang wrote:And we don't run the "orbit" offense.
Correct. Our was the "obit".
You have been on a roll lately

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:11 pm
by Eagle01
SMUBob wrote:WF has about 4,000 undergraduate students, so about 2/3 the size of SMU. But they are in a BCS conference.
Wake is a great model for the private schools. Other than USC, BC and maybe Miami, who can you name with more recent success? Among the BCS players, certainly not: Notre Dame, Stanford, Northwestern, Vandy, Baylor, Duke, Syracuse.
From the outside, it would appear they are doing it the "right" way, also. Long term commitment to a solid coach who redshirts everybody. Two solid years in a row improves the recruiting and they are able to ride the "virtuous cycle" so long as they can keep Grobe. Now you'd have to say Wake is set up to be a perennial upper division ACC program. How cool is that?
But it's helped a great deal that Florida State has weakened dramatically in the last few years, and that none of the North Carolina schools has a decent program going on right now.
Appalachian State might disagree,
Regarding Wake, they've only had success for the past two years, so let's not get ahead and suddenly say they're a model for success. Even with last year's 11-win season, Grobe is only a little more than a .500 coach at the school.

Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:24 pm
by Water Pony
$uccess requires money. BCS Cartel = revenue$

Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:37 am
by Hoop Fan
Winston Salem is also a nice sleepy, medium sized town that is about as far from the world of pro sports as you can get. Wake gets a ton more community support than we get, although i am sure they would like more.

Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:24 am
by Dukie
Oh, I have to read enough "if Wake can, why can't we" on Duke boards. Ugh.
In addition to the plusses mentioned elsewhere (Winston-Salem is supportive and not a pro town; they get BCS money; the other ACC North Carolina schools are down; many other traditional ACC powers are down), I'll add the preexisting fan base for the basketball program.
On the other hand, their stadium is an outdated dump (Amon Carter, but smaller and with less charm). Grobe is an impressive guy.

Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:48 pm
by Junior
Eagle01 wrote:SMUBob wrote:WF has about 4,000 undergraduate students, so about 2/3 the size of SMU. But they are in a BCS conference.
Wake is a great model for the private schools. Other than USC, BC and maybe Miami, who can you name with more recent success? Among the BCS players, certainly not: Notre Dame, Stanford, Northwestern, Vandy, Baylor, Duke, Syracuse.
From the outside, it would appear they are doing it the "right" way, also. Long term commitment to a solid coach who redshirts everybody. Two solid years in a row improves the recruiting and they are able to ride the "virtuous cycle" so long as they can keep Grobe. Now you'd have to say Wake is set up to be a perennial upper division ACC program. How cool is that?
But it's helped a great deal that Florida State has weakened dramatically in the last few years, and that none of the North Carolina schools has a decent program going on right now.
Appalachian State might disagree,
Regarding Wake, they've only had success for the past two years, so let's not get ahead and suddenly say they're a model for success. Even with last year's 11-win season, Grobe is only a little more than a .500 coach at the school.
I'd take 2 years of success over the crap product we've been putting out for 20+! Hell, I'd take 2 W's at this point....