rose bowl
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:26 pm7-0 usc after 4 minutes
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:26 pmPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:31 pm4 minutes!!!!!!! Seems like Musburger has been droning for hours.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:36 pmcall that 14-0 after 6:30
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:36 pmThis game has nothing but rout written all over it. In fact, it was written after they announced the matchup.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:05 pmDidn't I see this game already today....maybe it was called the Cotton Bowl?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:16 pmMaybe we have a game after that great run by Mendenhall,
21-10 Trojans early 3rd
21-10 Trojans early 3rd
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:33 pmIllinois needs to stop fumbling...
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:39 pmI love USC's tight end Fred Davis. A beast who can run, move and hit people.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:54 pmWierd, another Illini fumble
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:51 pmThe Trojans depth is ridiculous!
Fight on! 49-17 final.
Fight on! 49-17 final.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:53 pmIllinois had no business being on the same field as USC. the Rose Bowl Selection committee is stupid. Yes, it's traditional to have Big Ten vs. Pac 10, but to pass up #6 Mizzou for #13 Illinois? Come on....
Shame on The Orange Bowl Selection Committee too, taking Kansas over Mizzou. I hope Kansas gets reamed.
Shame on The Orange Bowl Selection Committee too, taking Kansas over Mizzou. I hope Kansas gets reamed.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:09 pmQuikSStang wrote:Illinois had no business being on the same field as USC. the Rose Bowl Selection committee is stupid. Yes, it's traditional to have Big Ten vs. Pac 10, but to pass up #6 Mizzou for #13 Illinois? Come on....
Shame on The Orange Bowl Selection Committee too, taking Kansas over Mizzou. I hope Kansas gets reamed.
Mizzou is no better than Illinois. In fact, they played this season, it was an even matchup. Mizzou won it on a freak play and even still Illinois had 1st and goal with 1 minute left to win and freshman qb throws braindead pick. Mizzou would have been equally outmatched as would just about anybody in LA.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:16 pmHoop Fan wrote:QuikSStang wrote:Illinois had no business being on the same field as USC. the Rose Bowl Selection committee is stupid. Yes, it's traditional to have Big Ten vs. Pac 10, but to pass up #6 Mizzou for #13 Illinois? Come on....
Shame on The Orange Bowl Selection Committee too, taking Kansas over Mizzou. I hope Kansas gets reamed.
Mizzou is no better than Illinois. In fact, they played this season, it was an even matchup. Mizzou won it on a freak play and even still Illinois had 1st and goal with 1 minute left to win and freshman qb throws braindead pick. Mizzou would have been equally outmatched as would just about anybody in LA.
I think Mizzou would have gone to the Orange to play Va. Tech. But it would have been a matter of how the rantings broke down and who was penciled in to go where. Don't think Mizzou, though, would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:20 pmi just wanted to see a better game. I didn't say Mizzou was necessarily better than Illinois, but I think it would have been a better game
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:46 ami say you have to give the Illini credit...it just goes to show that turnovers will be the death of you in big games...
if you take away two of those fumbles, it could have been a 3 pt. Illini lead
if you take away two of those fumbles, it could have been a 3 pt. Illini lead