Page 1 of 1
Academic Barriers for Top Talent
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:02 pmby locostang
I am so sick of this BS. Are our standards any higher than Notre Dame, Wake Forest, Vanderbilt, Stanford, Duke? Those schools all are way better academically and still have top athletic programs. Our standards should be no higher than those schools period.
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:02 pmby Stallion
please don't speak to June Jones in the next 24 hours
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:04 pmby davidsmu94
shut up and have this discussion on another day
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:05 pmby locostang
I am eating dinner with him right now. I am SO. I am using my new iPhone while I sit here with June and GJF at Bob's Chop House.
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:07 pmby Stallion
Tell him I'll volunteer to bail all SMU football players out of jail.
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:07 pmby locostang
davidsmu94 wrote:shut up and have this discussion on another day
Yes sir!
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:26 pmby SoCal_Pony
When you have this discussion 'another day' please include UC-Berkeley as an example of a school that lowered their admission standards to become relevant in the PAC-10.
UC-Berkeley, Stanford and UCLA are head-and-shoulders above SMU academically.
USC is probably better as well.
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:31 pmby locostang
I forgot USC too. They are pretty good in football.
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:39 pmby SMUer
Of course they're better than SMU academically, they have nearly double our percentage of Asians!
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:40 pmby Pony Soup
Get this thread OUT OF HERE... Not important right now