Page 1 of 2

New Receivers Coach Reinebold Named in Lawsuit

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:06 am
by MrMustang1965
from Sports Illustrated:

When the Smith family moved to Boise, from North Carolina last fall, Wanda Smith flew a University of Hawaii flag outside their new house. That caused quite a stir among the Boise State fans living nearby -- the Warriors and Broncos are conference rivals -- but Smith didn't care; her son Daniel had orally committed in April to play for the Warriors.

Before he made the commitment, Daniel Smith claims he had to promise he wouldn't entertain offers from other schools. So when Wanda Smith received a phone call in January -- following coach June Jones' departure to Southern Methodist -- from a Hawaii assistant claiming her son hadn't received an official offer, Daniel had no other scholarship options.

So now, Daniel Smith is taking the NCAA's system of verbal commitments to court by suing Hawaii and former Warriors defensive line coach Jeff Reinebold, who is now the receivers coach at SMU.

"I'm not trying to get any money. I'm just trying to get my scholarship that I was promised 10 months ago," Smith said. "They told me to not talk to any other school, to tell everyone I was committed to Hawaii. I did, for 10 months. And one day my scholarship is gone."

Smith's situation isn't unique. Every year, thousands of athletes find themselves scrambling for scholarships after coaching changes or after coaches simply rescind non-binding scholarship offers because they found more talented players. What is unique is that Smith has decided to take his case to court.

"This is the first one that I'm aware of of this type where an athlete has actually proceeded to file a lawsuit," said Wake Forest law professor Timothy Davis, an expert in contract and sports law. "I've heard of similar cases where there were some rumblings made and some complaints, but they were resolved amicably by the athlete and the institution."

Sports law scholars will watch this case closely, because it could set a legal precedent. If a school must pay after revoking a scholarship offer it may force schools to fundamentally chance the process by which they offer scholarships.

"What's interesting about it is that it's a practice that happens more frequently than universities would like to admit," Davis said. "That's why I think it would be an important case and would establish an important precedent."

Smith, who played his junior season at Providence High in Charlotte, N.C., became intrigued by Hawaii while watching the Warriors' 41-24 win over Arizona State in the 2006 Hawaii Bowl. The following March, Wanda Smith sent a highlight tape of her son for Reinebold to evaluate. Wanda Smith said she received an e-mail on March 15, 2007 from Reinebold inviting Smith to come to the campus on an unofficial visit. The text of the e-mail is included in Smith's complaint:

"ALOHA WANDA,

"YES I DID RECEIVE THE VIDEO AND I DO THINK THAT DANIEL IS A DIVISION 1 PROSPECT AS A DEFENSIVE BACK....WE WOULD LOVE TO WELCOME HIM ON AN UNOFFICIAL VISIT THIS SPRING AND IF YOU WOULD GET BACK TO ME WITH DATES THAT YOU WILL BE HERE I CAN MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR HIM TO MEET WITH ACADEMIC PEOPLE HERE AT HAWAII.....

"HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND AND THANKS FOR SENDING THE VIDEO...

"ALOHA

"JEFF"

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/w ... =si_latest

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:59 am
by OR-See-Nee
Tim Davis, who is quoted in that article, was formerly on the law faculty at SMU.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:26 am
by Mexmustang
I obviously am missing something...an invite to an official visit is not an offer. What happened on this visit?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:37 am
by FWMustangGirl
Mexmustang wrote:I obviously am missing something...an invite to an official visit is not an offer. What happened on this visit?


As I read the email, it was an unofficial visit.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:37 am
by jtstang
OR-See-Nee wrote:Tim Davis, who is quoted in that article, was formerly on the law faculty at SMU.

One of my favorite law professors, was sad to hear SMU let him go....

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:38 am
by PK
Mexmustang wrote:I obviously am missing something...an invite to an official visit is not an offer. What happened on this visit?
Actually it was an invite for an unofficial visit. I guess that means you pay your own way.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:42 am
by Mexmustang
I realize that, but what am I missing...where is the offer and the acceptance, offering and accepting a scholarship? What transpired during the visit?
Secondly, I thought only the head coach typically made such offers, why involve an assistant?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:04 pm
by SMUMan02
Mexmustang wrote:I realize that, but what am I missing...where is the offer and the acceptance, offering and accepting a scholarship? What transpired during the visit?
Secondly, I thought only the head coach typically made such offers, why involve an assistant?


I'm sure the offer and acceptance is alleged somewhere else in the complaint

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:39 pm
by Bergermeister
jtstang wrote: One of my favorite law professors, was sad to hear SMU let him go....

:roll:

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:00 pm
by OR-See-Nee
According to the article, the kid claims that on the kid's birthday, Reinebold called the kid and offered him a scholarship, but only if the kid was "100%" committed. The kid supposedly told Reinebold that he was committed. Reinebold supposedly continued to confirm the scholarship offer on a monthly basis.

The kid's only other offer was from Portland State.

No written offer from Hawai'i was made, according to the kid.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:03 pm
by George S. Patton
Garbage. Complete garbage.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:06 pm
by FWMustangGirl
OR-See-Nee wrote:According to the article, the kid claims that on the kid's birthday, Reinebold called the kid and offered him a scholarship, but only if the kid was "100%" committed. The kid supposedly told Reinebold that he was committed. Reinebold supposedly continued to confirm the scholarship offer on a monthly basis.

The kid's only other offer was from Portland State.

No written offer from Hawai'i was made, according to the kid.


He said, he said? Surely the kid has something more than just this email and a verbal promise he claims was made.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:16 pm
by PonyPride
OR-See-Nee wrote:No written offer from Hawai'i was made, according to the kid.
Seems to me that's the end of the discussion/lawsuit, isn't it?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:16 pm
by MrMustang1965
Stallion has a thread on this same subject over in the 'Recruiting' forum with some very informative legal discussions taking place amongst posters.

My apologies for not having seen that thread earlier.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:46 pm
by SMUMan02
PonyPride wrote:
OR-See-Nee wrote:No written offer from Hawai'i was made, according to the kid.
Seems to me that's the end of the discussion/lawsuit, isn't it?


No