Page 1 of 2
why adidas
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:34 amby expony18
sucks...
http://gobearcats.cstv.com/sports/m-foo ... 08aaa.html
click on the link to the photo gallery, these uniforms are terrible!!!!
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:49 amby ponyfan84
i love those claw marks on the side of their pants. let's just hope adidas doesn't put horseshoes on the side of ours. hideous, hideous uniforms.
Re: why adidas
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:49 amby DickerJames
I don't care for the cat stripes on the pants, but if you compare them to what Nike does then they look old school.
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:31 amby Bergermeister
adida$
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:11 amby Pony Up
As goofy as those claw marks are on the sides, they're still a billion times better than the mess Nike rolls out in Oregon ...
... or the one-arm crap in Florida ...
... or whatever this fashion trainwreck is supposed to be in Syracuse.
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:15 amby NavyCrimson
What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their souls for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms.
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:38 pmby abezontar
NavyCrimson wrote:What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their soles for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms, also.
How can they play football when they don't have bottoms to their feet?
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:47 pmby Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
abezontar wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their soles for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms, also.
How can they play football when they don't have bottoms to their feet?
maybe because they sold fish instead?
Re: why adidas
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:27 pmby Paladin
DickerJames wrote:I don't care for the cat stripes on the pants, but if you compare them to what Nike does then they look old school.
Those aren't football uniforms; they were just auditioning for
Cats off-broadway
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:56 pmby jimmieho
I don't think Aididas will go too overboard with our uni. You don't see the SMU stuff marketed out beyond the university. It appears SMU maintains a little control with what adn how the market their apparel/uniforms.
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:47 pmby J.T.supporta
i say expect a somewhat basic but sleak jersey design like the Nebraska jerseys
Posted:
Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:51 pmby that's great raplh
that orangeman uni was cool
Posted:
Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:21 amby mustang1108
I don't think adidas does a bad job with jerseys they usually tend to have some of the more classic looks. Just look at the teams they have that have some of the most classic looks in college football like tennessee, wisconsin, notre dame, and ucla. also did anyone notice that on the ugliest uniform thread with the exception of notre dame green and rhode island all the rest were made by nike. and honestly i don't know how rhode island made it. their uniforms really aren't very good but who cares about that school and i have seen a lot worse in d 1-a
Posted:
Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:35 amby smu diamond m
Cin's unis weren't too ugly, but the claw rips in the side look ghetto
Posted:
Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:03 amby J.T.supporta
smu diamond m wrote:Cin's unis weren't too ugly, but the claw rips in the side look ghetto
dont know how those nice new unis look ghetto