Page 1 of 1

Backward, lateral: coaches accused of making a lateral move.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:03 pm
by HB Pony Dad
http://uweekly.com/newsmag/07-30-2008/8908

"Case Study Two: June Jones, from the University of Hawaii to Southern Methodist University.

Why it’s Lateral: Anytime a coach has played at a school, coaches are expected to feel at least a certain degree of loyalty. Typically, exploits at the alma mater are regarded higher than a foreign coach. June Jones had played for the University of Hawaii back when they were the Rainbow Warriors, and later was an assistant coach. There are not a whole lot of reasons needed to stay in Hawaii, given its sunny, carefree nature. June Jones had carved for himself a nice niche out in the islands, running an scheme outdated in both the pros and major college football. He utilized local recruits and players kicked off teams for criminal behavior, to create one of the more potent mid-major offenses. So why leave all that behind and go to a school that hadn’t been to a bowl game since the NCAA nuked it in ’89 for having the most rampant rules violations ever recorded in college football? Like Dantonio, Hawaii offered to match SMU’s pay and promised upgraded facilities.

Why it’s Forward: Well, about that promise to upgrade facilities: Jones said it was just lies. The facilities of the former Rainbow Warriors were as competitive as the schedule Hawaii played last year. It was easily the worst thing about the program by a mile, and had been so since Jones had gotten there, in spite of several contractual promises to improve. Basically, it was as if an abusive husband was saying “You know all those beatings I give you? If you stay with me, those beating will stop at some point.â€

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:12 pm
by perunapower
Uhh... we got "nuked" in '87.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:24 pm
by MrMustang1965
perunapower wrote:Uhh... we got "nuked" in '87.
Obviously the writer of that article missed journalism class the day that they were taught to write "In 1987, SMU became the first school in collegiate athletic history to receive the NCAA's 'death penalty'."

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:38 pm
by FWMustangGirl
The most rampant rules violations ever recorded in college football? Really?

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:45 pm
by ponywhupp9202
Interesting comment about the "outdated scheme". I guess we'll see soon enough.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:53 pm
by mrydel
I do not believe Hawaii ever agreed to match $2,000,000.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:57 pm
by smu diamond m
What a terrible article!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:58 pm
by jtstang
FWMustangGirl wrote:The most rampant rules violations ever recorded in college football? Really?

That's about the only thing he got right.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:05 pm
by perunapower
jtstang wrote:
FWMustangGirl wrote:The most rampant rules violations ever recorded in college football? Really?

That's about the only thing he got right.


I thought Alabama State held that record with their 668 violations. Surely that has to be more than us.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:06 pm
by jtstang
I thought "rampant" was a description of severity, not quantity.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:08 pm
by perunapower
jtstang wrote:I thought "rampant" was a description of severity, not quantity.


I took it to mean "unrestrained".

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:12 pm
by jtstang
Oh, we were quite unrestrained in our payment of players, even after we had promised to stop in exchange for leniency on our major violation just prior the the one that got us nuked...in 1987.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:13 pm
by mrydel
We're #1, we're #1, we're #1!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:42 pm
by RednBlue11
Hawaii offered to match SMU’s pay and promised upgraded facilities.


no they didn't and no they could not...they promised him new facilities years ago..and where are they?

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:47 pm
by LAPonyAir
mrydel wrote:I do not believe Hawaii ever agreed to match $2,000,000.


Right. If I remember correctly, they were willing to give him a substantial raise but it was still under 1 mil.