Page 1 of 1
Photos
Posted:
Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:13 amby MrMustang1965
Posted:
Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:17 amby TheBestAvailable
Thanks for the pictures. That Tarp with the school name and logo was a great idea. It really looked good on TV and made that dump of a stadium look nice.
I've always hated that faded, tacky looking, bare hill in our south end zone. It just seems like such a give up. You spend millions on this stadium and leave that hill empty. At least paint SMU across it.
Photos
Posted:
Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:09 amby MiMiguys
Thank You for the photo's. As again you have came threw for us ponyfans. But I also say Rice Stadium looked good on TV. By the way I appreciate all that you do.
Re: Photos
Posted:
Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:11 amby ponyfan08
I like the first scoreboard picture, the second one, not so much.
Posted:
Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:14 pmby Stallion
Rice Stadium has "Great Bones" for a Stadium that is 58 years old. It looked like a dump for years-its still no world-class facility with all the bells and whistles you really want(and need today) but that 10-12 Million Rice spent on improving Rice Stadium was a bargain. Think about the other stadiums from that era-Floyd Casey, Amon Carter, Tech with its poor stadium grade. Considering very little was spent it is a quality venue. No its not one of the best but its stood the test of time with the upgrades.
