Page 1 of 2

Why no Beasley?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:12 pm
by SmooBoy
Am I mistaken, or did Cole Beasley (82) not play Saturday?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:14 pm
by J.T.supporta
the participation list says he played

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... l#GAME.PRE

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:16 pm
by RGV Pony
participation list also shows that Bonilla played in his jersey and a pair of shorts

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:46 pm
by Nacho
I saw a pass that was overthrown to him. Am I on top of this stuff or what?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:22 pm
by PonyPride
You're all over it, Nacho.
Beasley had two passes thrown his way, as I recall.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:52 pm
by mrydel
I thought that was Cole Loftin.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:04 pm
by SmooBoy
Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:12 pm
by mrydel
SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?


You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:12 pm
by JasonB
No, Beasley was out there, but not much. Bryant was used in his place as the fourth WR, and Wilkerson was the third WR.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:15 pm
by SmooBoy
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?


You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?


Nope, I guess not.

Just surprised he was not used more. That little #23 for TXSt was sprinting past our line all day. Thought Beasley could have been used in the same way.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:21 pm
by mrydel
SmooBoy wrote:
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?


You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?


Nope, I guess not.

Just surprised he was not used more. That little #23 for TXSt was sprinting past our line all day. Thought Beasley could have been used in the same way.


Apparently Loftin has not played this year. I thought I had heard his name called on the long overthrow. Probably was Beasley and I heard Cole and just thought Loftin. Thats the kind of guy I am.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:36 pm
by SmooBoy
We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:57 pm
by mrydel
SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me. :lol:


I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:17 pm
by SmooBoy
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me. :lol:


I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.


Yep, a BO-el of Cole while Justin time to sing "Emmanuel."

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:21 pm
by Come and Take It
SmooBoy wrote:
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me. :lol:


I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.


Yep, a BO-el of Cole while Justin time to sing "Emmanuel."


Please stop, or I will be forced to include you in a new trio including the Pony Up song and the PA guy. :lol: