Page 1 of 1
Payout.........

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:15 pm
by PonySnob
What kind of payout does SMU get for going and playing a school like Texas Tech? Going and playing a team like LSU, Texas, USC, Florida, gets a school a $700+ payout.

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:18 pm
by expony18
oregon state got 1.1 million to play penn state

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:19 pm
by J.T.supporta
when your payout is an [deleted].whoopin, its not worth it

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:29 pm
by tristatecoog
The payout comes from the home games that TT returns.
Eastern Washington is a pure rent a win. They may get $350K to $400K. Didn't Tulsa back out on TT because they got a better deal by playing someone else for the buyout?

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:20 pm
by Pony Soup
tristatecoog wrote:The payout comes from the home games that TT returns.
Eastern Washington is a pure rent a win. They may get $350K to $400K. Didn't Tulsa back out on TT because they got a better deal by playing someone else for the buyout?
Teams can get BIG money for the away game. Fl. Atlantic just received 700k for appearing in Austin..

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:25 pm
by PonySnob
UNT is getting $700K for playing LSU and LSU is certainly not going to be playing a game at Fouts Field anytime soon. In looking at the future non-conference schedules, outside of possibly A$M, it doesn't look like we are playing many "money" games..............

Posted:
Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:56 pm
by mr. pony
J.T.supporta wrote:when your payout is an [deleted].whoopin, its not worth it
disagree. Play the big boys.

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:14 am
by The XtC
[quote="Pony Soup"][quote="tristatecoog"]The payout comes from the home games that TT returns.
Eastern Washington is a pure rent a win. They may get $350K to $400K. Didn't Tulsa back out on TT because they got a better deal by playing someone else for the buyout?[/quote]
Teams can get BIG money for the away game. Fl. Atlantic just received 700k for appearing in Austin..[/quote]
Sure, you CAN get BIG money, but that doesnt mean you WILL.
Normally, a team gets a big payday only when there is no return game. Texas pays Florida Atlantic to come and play in Austin, because they have no intention of giving FAU a return game next year (or ever) in Boca Raton. Texas Tech doesnt pay us anything to come to Lubbock, and we dont pay them anything to come to Dallas, each home team keeps their own gate reciepts. That's how a home and home series works.

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:19 am
by The XtC
[quote="PonySnob"]UNT is getting $700K for playing LSU and LSU is certainly not going to be playing a game at Fouts Field anytime soon. In looking at the future non-conference schedules, outside of possibly A$M, it doesn't look like we are playing many "money" games..............[/quote]
We dont play any "money" games. Unless you count Texas State, Sam Houston and SFA, who we pay to come here.

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:24 am
by Stallion
that's why Orsini has focused on scheduling teams that can put butts in the seats. And why playing the Northwesterns, Vandys and Wake Forests of the world do not make financial sense especially with the disaster that is CUSA Attendance.

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:06 am
by PonySnob
Stallion wrote:that's why Orsini has focused on scheduling teams that can put butts in the seats. And why playing the Northwesterns, Vandys and Wake Forests of the world do not make financial sense especially with the disaster that is CUSA Attendance.
Well playing Texas State didn't exactly fill up Ford last weekend. Was the NTSU game last year a sell-out? Even playing TCU has yet to help us totally fill up the stadium Besides the opening game at Ford against Kansas and our rent-a-fan games against Texas Tech, which other opponents have helped SMU put 32K into the stands?

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:11 am
by RGV Pony
PonySnob wrote:Stallion wrote:that's why Orsini has focused on scheduling teams that can put butts in the seats. And why playing the Northwesterns, Vandys and Wake Forests of the world do not make financial sense especially with the disaster that is CUSA Attendance.
Well playing Texas State didn't exactly fill up Ford last weekend. Was the NTSU game last year a sell-out? Even playing TCU has yet to help us totally fill up the stadium Besides the opening game at Ford against Kansas and our rent-a-fan games against Texas Tech, which other opponents have helped SMU put 32K into the stands?
Baylor was close (29k I think)

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 5:47 pm
by J.T.supporta
mr. pony wrote:J.T.supporta wrote:when your payout is an [deleted].whoopin, its not worth it
disagree. Play the big boys.
im not saying don't play the big boys, im just saying im down with playing baylor but not Texas Tech. that Missouri game should be interesting in a few years

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:38 pm
by ozfan
PonySnob wrote:UNT is getting $700K for playing LSU and LSU is certainly not going to be playing a game at Fouts Field anytime soon. In looking at the future non-conference schedules, outside of possibly A$M, it doesn't look like we are playing many "money" games..............
NT play a lot of these money games and get killed then lose out when recruiting because kids do not like to play for a losing team.

Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:43 pm
by PonySnob
ozfan wrote:PonySnob wrote:UNT is getting $700K for playing LSU and LSU is certainly not going to be playing a game at Fouts Field anytime soon. In looking at the future non-conference schedules, outside of possibly A$M, it doesn't look like we are playing many "money" games..............
NT play a lot of these money games and get killed then lose out when recruiting because kids do not like to play for a losing team.
And SMU is different how?