Page 1 of 1
Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:23 pmby expony18
2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 0 Sacks, 39 yards rushing
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:25 pmby smupony94
BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. – Being homeless in this upper crust enclave is not exactly like living on the street in other places. There are handouts of $2,000 and bottles of Dom Perignon, lucky finds of Gucci shoes and diamond-encrusted bracelets, a chance to rub shoulders with rich and famous locals such as Mark Wahlberg and Master P, even empty houses to live in.
"This is the finest place you can be," said Isaac Young, an affable 59-year-old with a wide grin and a smooth baritone voice who has been homeless in Beverly Hills since 1992.
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:26 pmby PonySnob
expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
And you Cedar Springs love fest with JW continues................
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:27 pmby expony18
PonySnob wrote:expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
And you Cedar Springs love fest with JW continues................
if he doesnt punch you in the mouth, I will...
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:52 pmby smupony94
expony18 wrote:PonySnob wrote:expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
And you Cedar Springs love fest with JW continues................
if he doesnt punch you in the mouth, I will...
I wonder who the next QB to grace your avatar will be? I should start a poll
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:53 pmby smu diamond m
yawn
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:54 pmby expony18
smupony94 wrote:expony18 wrote:PonySnob wrote:expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
And you Cedar Springs love fest with JW continues................
if he doesnt punch you in the mouth, I will...
I wonder who the next QB to grace your avatar will be? I should start a poll
Richard Bartel? Tate Wallis? Chris Phillips? Ricky Joe Meeks?
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:31 pmby PonySnob
expony18 wrote:smupony94 wrote:expony18 wrote:PonySnob wrote:expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
And you Cedar Springs love fest with JW continues................
if he doesnt punch you in the mouth, I will...
I wonder who the next QB to grace your avatar will be? I should start a poll
Richard Bartel? Tate Wallis? Chris Phillips? Ricky Joe Meeks?
Don't forget Chris Sanders. Didn't we have a guy whose last name was James at the QB position during the Rossley years?
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:41 pmby expony18
Bo Levi Mitchell through 3 qtrs
13-24, 155 yds, 0 Tds, 5 INTs, -10 yds rushing
Re: Justin Willis v. Texas Tech
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:42 pmby SMU2007
expony18 wrote:2007
Loss 49-9
15-33, 138 yards, O TDs, 2 INTs, 3 Sacks, 40 yards Rushing
2006
Loss 35-3
9-16 69 yards, O TDs, O INTs, O Sacks, 39 yards rushing
you know there is a 0 on your keyboard. It's right next to the 9.
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:50 pmby smu diamond m
Maybe he was too busy Oing about JW
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:52 pmby expony18
smu diamond m wrote:Maybe he was too busy Oing about JW
no i was booing our 5 ints...
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:52 pmby that's great raplh
romo
Posted:
Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:38 pmby perunapower
smu diamond m wrote:Maybe he was too busy Oing about JW
Showing his O-face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6UPR3OdroY