# 1 and 2!
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:56 pmPage 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:57 pmWish we had more of a 3rd threat, after that we don't have another receiver in the top 120
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:01 amPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:57 amIt's something...
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:14 amjust wait til next year
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:38 amA little skewed given SMU has played 8 games while most of those players are at 7:
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?y ... s&site=org
Of the 12 players averaging over 100 rec yds per game, 6 of them are in CUSA.
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?y ... s&site=org
Of the 12 players averaging over 100 rec yds per game, 6 of them are in CUSA.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:47 amAlso a little skewed by the fact that neither Robinson nor Sanders is leading in receptions, though - their total yards are insane. Keep it going, guys.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:09 am7 out of the top 10 receivers are from non-BCS schools.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:34 amSMU21TCU10 wrote:Wish we had more of a 3rd threat, after that we don't have another receiver in the top 120
Most teams don't even have 2 in the top 120.
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:25 pmwoo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:28 pmthat's great raplh wrote:woo
wooo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:23 pmPony Soup wrote:that's great raplh wrote:woo
wooo
woooo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:25 pmOH YEAH!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:27 pmStallion wrote:OH YEAH!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:41 pmBoys...this is going to be commonplace around here for quite some time!!!