Page 1 of 4

1 win seems like a lock now...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:57 am
by ClickClack
It will be tough to win without our top two recieving threats (AR and ES) and our signal caller on defense for the last two games....

you either do things JJ's way and get on board...or you get out. JJ doesnt care if you are a stud or a dud...you follow his rules.

Will the suspensions of ES and AR have any impact on breaking SMU records?

Re: 1 win seems like a lock now...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:00 am
by One Trick Pony
ClickClack wrote:It will be tough to win without our top two recieving threats (AR and ES) and our signal caller on defense....

can we catch a break?


Not a chanse @ UTEP sorry...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:16 am
by jtstang
Newsflash: We haven't won with them, braniac.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:21 am
by ClickClack
jtstang wrote:Newsflash: We haven't won with them, braniac.


very true, but we were able to compete in most of the games (houston, tulsa, UCF, memphis). Obviously Tech and TCU are in a whole different class. Rice is a solid level above us..and we had the worst possible conditions for the Navy Game..now our remaining two games would be winnable games with a full squad...I am just saying, with these suspensions we do not stand a chance.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:35 am
by mathman
ClickClack wrote:
jtstang wrote:Newsflash: We haven't won with them, braniac.


very true, but we were able to compete in most of the games (houston, tulsa, UCF, memphis). Obviously Tech and TCU are in a whole different class. Rice is a solid level above us..and we had the worst possible conditions for the Navy Game..now our remaining two games would be winnable games with a full squad...I am just saying, with these suspensions we do not stand a chance.

Why haven't they just canceled the game? Makes no sense wasting the money to go there.

Re: 1 win seems like a lock now...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:39 am
by kent dorfman
ClickClack wrote:It will be tough to win without our top two recieving threats (AR and ES) and our signal caller on defense for the last two games....

you either do things JJ's way and get on board...or you get out. JJ doesnt care if you are a stud or a dud...you follow his rules.

Will the suspensions of ES and AR have any impact on breaking SMU records?


I've been out of the loop. Where is the thread about ES and AR being suspended?

Re: 1 win seems like a lock now...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:40 am
by ClickClack
It was posted yesterday..but for some reason in was delted.

Re: 1 win seems like a lock now...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:42 am
by 03Mustang
kent dorfman wrote:
ClickClack wrote:It will be tough to win without our top two recieving threats (AR and ES) and our signal caller on defense for the last two games....

you either do things JJ's way and get on board...or you get out. JJ doesnt care if you are a stud or a dud...you follow his rules.

Will the suspensions of ES and AR have any impact on breaking SMU records?


I've been out of the loop. Where is the thread about ES and AR being suspended?


Yeah, exactly - I was trying to look all over for some info on this...what's the deal?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:43 am
by OC Mustang
It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.

PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.

Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.

To troll: Image

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:43 am
by George S. Patton
Yeah, somebody told me about this and then there was a response that this was a joke and that the three of them (ES, AR and Smart) were not suspended.

That said, it doesn't matter.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:45 am
by kent dorfman
OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.

PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.

Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.

To troll: Image


Haha I finally figured out what Webmaster's signature is talking about now. Thanks!

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:45 am
by ClickClack
OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.

PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.

Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.

To troll: Image


They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:49 am
by OC Mustang
ClickClack wrote:
OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.

PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.

Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.

To troll: Image


They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games


Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:51 am
by ClickClack
your apology is not needed...you will see for yourself soon.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:57 am
by George S. Patton
ClickClack wrote:your apology is not needed...you will see for yourself soon.


Oooooohhhhh! There is some tough talk there. Why do you feel the need to post it? Do you like to champion their failures?

Congratulations on taking joy in something like this. People like you make me sick.