DMN: SUSPENSION
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:07 pmPage 1 of 3
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:09 pmposted simultaneously. Damn.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:10 pmiknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:11 pmexpony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Why
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:11 pmhe won't get it.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:13 pmGeorge S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Why
thats whyOC Mustang wrote:ClickClack wrote:OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.
PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.
Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.
To troll:
They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games
Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:13 pmGeorge S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Why
He said Big 10 football is the best and was bashed for it
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:15 pmexpony18 wrote:George S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Whythats whyOC Mustang wrote:ClickClack wrote:OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.
PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.
Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.
To troll:
They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games
Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.
Then take your argument to him and don't make a blanket statement.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:16 pmexpony18 wrote:George S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Whythats whyOC Mustang wrote:ClickClack wrote:OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.
PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.
Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.
To troll:
They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games
Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.
I don't know that he deserves an apology for that, the poster wanted corroboration that the original poster never provided. He definitely could have been more tactful about it though.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:18 pmsee boldabezontar wrote:expony18 wrote:George S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Whythats whyOC Mustang wrote:ClickClack wrote:OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.
PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.
Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.
To troll:
They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games
Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.
I don't know that he deserves an apology for that, the poster wanted corroboration that the original poster never provided. He definitely could have been more tactful about it though.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:19 pmthanks expony...good lookin' out
I wasn't happy they were suspended, simply relaying information to fellow SMU fans.
I wasn't happy they were suspended, simply relaying information to fellow SMU fans.
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:22 pmOnce again, a very fundamental question about this program has to be asked…
Is SMU truly on a level playing field?
Can anyone here name another program, especially a Top 25 one, that would suspend 2 of its most important players for the remainder of the season for ‘minor’ infractions?
And to iknowsports…..thanks for the inside scoop
Is SMU truly on a level playing field?
Can anyone here name another program, especially a Top 25 one, that would suspend 2 of its most important players for the remainder of the season for ‘minor’ infractions?
And to iknowsports…..thanks for the inside scoop
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:23 pmi guess that depends on JJ's definition of "minor"SoCal_Pony wrote:Once again, a very fundamental question about this program has to be asked…
Is SMU truly on a level playing field?
Can anyone here name another program, especially a Top 25 one, that would suspend 2 of its most important players for the remainder of the season for ‘minor’ infractions?
And to iknowsports…..thanks for the inside scoop
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:24 pmexpony18 wrote:see boldabezontar wrote:expony18 wrote:George S. Patton wrote:expony18 wrote:iknowsports deserves an apology from a bunch of you....
Whythats whyOC Mustang wrote:ClickClack wrote:OC Mustang wrote:It's a troll. I have heard no collaborating information from personal sources, and neither this guy nor "Iknowsports" will put up proof.
PP took down the other thread, perhaps because of some rather colorful calling out by several of us or because it was a lie. I kinda err on the lie.
Somebody buzz PP and let him know troll is back.
To troll:
They are suspended and will not play the remaining two games
Show me details and proof, troll, and I will apologize. Otherwise, take this, your only posts on this board...(gee, I wonder why)...and go pound sand.
I don't know that he deserves an apology for that, the poster wanted corroboration that the original poster never provided. He definitely could have been more tactful about it though.
doh!
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:26 pm