|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Pony Soup » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:18 pm
The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
It tastes better when served from a Bowl (game)!
-
Pony Soup

-
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
by expony18 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:29 pm
Pony Soup wrote:The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
how many of those teams could we beat?
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by Pony Soup » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:33 pm
expony18 wrote:Pony Soup wrote:The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
how many of those teams could we beat?
Get back to work
It tastes better when served from a Bowl (game)!
-
Pony Soup

-
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
by MrMustang1965 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:33 pm
expony18 wrote:Pony Soup wrote:The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
how many of those teams could we beat?
I'd go with the 2008 SMU squad winning against:
Army
Duke
Eastern Michigan
Indiana
Kent State
Middle Tennessee
North Texas
Toledo
-

MrMustang1965

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas,TX,USA
-
by CalallenStang » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:04 am
Pony Soup wrote:The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
How does SMU fall before San Diego State & San Jose State if the list is in alphabetical order?
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by Pony Soup » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:19 am
CalallenStang wrote:Pony Soup wrote:The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order: Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
Sucks
How does SMU fall before San Diego State & San Jose State if the list is in alphabetical order?
They called the first "word" in our name "S" i suppose. So S comes before Sa....
haha idiots
It tastes better when served from a Bowl (game)!
-
Pony Soup

-
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
by NavyCrimson » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:36 am
What a joke!!!
Half the teams go bowling & probably only 10% - 20% actually deserve it. College football is such a watered-down product now days. No wonder the bowls mean nothing with such low TV ratings. 
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!
For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
-

NavyCrimson

-
- Posts: 3163
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)
by 2112 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:13 am
NavyCrimson wrote:What a joke!!! Half the teams go bowling & probably only 10% - 20% actually deserve it. College football is such a watered-down product now days. No wonder the bowls mean nothing with such low TV ratings. 
it's only a big deal if you don't go.....so many bowls....you have to suck pretty bad......to not go......
-
2112

-
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 10:32 am
by Buddha » Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:55 am
NavyCrimson wrote:What a joke!!! Half the teams go bowling & probably only 10% - 20% actually deserve it. College football is such a watered-down product now days. No wonder the bowls mean nothing with such low TV ratings. 
If the ratings were so low as to not make money, the games wouldn't be shown... but every bowl game is on TV. There's plenty of money being made, even in the lower-tier bowls.
-

Buddha

-
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by bagice » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:09 pm
Buddha wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:What a joke!!! Half the teams go bowling & probably only 10% - 20% actually deserve it. College football is such a watered-down product now days. No wonder the bowls mean nothing with such low TV ratings. 
If the ratings were so low as to not make money, the games wouldn't be shown... but every bowl game is on TV. There's plenty of money being made, even in the lower-tier bowls.
That is the truth, I saw some article about ESPN making a ton of money televising a crappy bowl or two every day of the week.
The bowl games are a cash cow in how they have bundled them all together to sell advertising, they need quanity, not quality....I would expect more to be added.
Not sure if there is a compete clause or not, but I would like to see the City of Dallas do something with the Cotton Bowl, create a Dallas Bowl or something, would be a shame for it to not have a post season bowl when the Cotton Bowl moves.
Womack + Wishbone = Heisman
Class of 89
-

bagice

-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:10 pm
- Location: Plano, Tx.
by orguy » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Sure has changed from yesteryear.
It used to be a reward for a successful season.
Rarely would a team outside the top 25 end up in bowl.
-
orguy

-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
- Location: SF bay area
by Dooby » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:38 pm
bagice wrote:Buddha wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:What a joke!!! Half the teams go bowling & probably only 10% - 20% actually deserve it. College football is such a watered-down product now days. No wonder the bowls mean nothing with such low TV ratings. 
If the ratings were so low as to not make money, the games wouldn't be shown... but every bowl game is on TV. There's plenty of money being made, even in the lower-tier bowls.
That is the truth, I saw some article about ESPN making a ton of money televising a crappy bowl or two every day of the week. The bowl games are a cash cow in how they have bundled them all together to sell advertising, they need quanity, not quality....I would expect more to be added. Not sure if there is a compete clause or not, but I would like to see the City of Dallas do something with the Cotton Bowl, create a Dallas Bowl or something, would be a shame for it to not have a post season bowl when the Cotton Bowl moves.
I heard there are discussions. CUSA v. MWC was what I recall.
At some point, you run out of eligible teams.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
-

Dooby

-
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
by mr. pony » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:21 pm
Stallion wrote:72 teams were bowl eligible 47 were not
There should be a play-in game. 
-
mr. pony

-
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm
by mr. pony » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:24 pm
orguy wrote:Sure has changed from yesteryear.
It used to be a reward for a successful season.
Rarely would a team outside the top 25 end up in bowl.
That's why our goal shouldn't just be a bowl. It's not what it used to be. Our goal should be C-USA championships. Hope JJ doesn't think his job is done here after taking a 6-6 team to the La Quinta Bowl.
-
mr. pony

-
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests
|
|