Page 1 of 5

updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:00 pm
by ALEX LIFESON
There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:31 pm
by mrydel
That is one tiny team.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:19 pm
by ALEX LIFESON
This is pretty odd, almost all teams fudge up an inch or two, SMU goes with the real heights. Mabey JJ is trying to psych out the opposition. :wink:

Fear the vertically challenged Ponies! :twisted:

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:46 pm
by One Trick Pony
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical


Looks like a cinco de mayo party. were not big, but we could be good.

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:22 pm
by ozfan
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical


Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:13 am
by expony18
ozfan wrote:
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical


Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.
he wont be kicking this year

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 am
by PonyTales
ozfan wrote:
ALEX LIFESON wrote:There are a few guys that have not been updated, but most have. And yes, we had a few more shrink.

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... #Numerical


Cunningham is now listed as a db and not a kicker.
Scoops (I think) wrote that a few weeks ago.
And I was under the impression he might still kick off.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:24 am
by Stallion
Wow! We are shrinking!!!!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:59 am
by RGV Pony
Looks like we have 20 O-linemen, 20 WRs, and 20 DE's to go with 3 DT or DL. Okay, I'm exagerrating a little.

Any conspicuous disappearances that we havent already discussed?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:53 am
by BUS
OMG - We need a herd of big men on the d-line.

From this board to GOD's ears.

Go Mustangs.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:10 am
by ponyboy
As an offensive line comparison, Tulsa averages 6'3, 278. We average 6'3, 279.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:22 am
by ponyboy
As a defensive line comparison, Tulsa goes 6'2.5, 261 and we go 6'3 and 283.

Re: updated 2009 roster is up

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:52 am
by Cadillac
PonyTales wrote:Scoops (I think) wrote that a few weeks ago.
And I was under the impression he might still kick off.


Does this mean that our Pet Aggie will be kicking? As a True Freshman, Szymanski put a ton of kickoffs into the endzone. Hopefully his FG accuracy has climbed a bit so that we can get Loftus a redshirt year.

-CoS

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:06 am
by jtstang
As a 2008 record comparison, Tulsa went 11-3 and we went 1-11.

Point being, I guess, someday it would be nice to have size AND ability.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:19 am
by ponyboy
Point well made. But this should put to rest the idea that we're a small team, at least on the lines where size matters most.