Page 1 of 2
more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:35 pmby Nacho
http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/with the more later ending kate seems to be saying there will be more later. at least that's the way i read it.
could we see some changes on the o?
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pmby RGV Pony
Nacho wrote:http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/
with the more later ending kate seems to be saying there will be more later. at least that's the way i read it.
could we see some changes on the o?
she always puts that.
More later...
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:47 pmby Stallion
Let me boil this down. Since we didn't see a backup Saturday Nite-there is no plans for a backup to play except in an emergency.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:52 pmby Nacho
i know someone who refuses to go to any more smu games as long as bm is the qb. i'm not there yet but i'm getting close. not to bag on the guy but i have zero confidence in him.
mccown or bm? i asked someone this the othe other day. now that is a tough one.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:58 pmby Hoop Fan
Gotta say McCown, easy, all day long. particulary based on what he did with apparently better coaching after he left here, and then went to NFL. Can you imagine what JJ could have done with McCown by "coaching him up"? Better question remains, BLM or Willis? Or BLM vs Unnamed Average Ordinary Pedestrian Juco Prospect?
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:05 pmby Nacho
as much as i hate how mccown left after cavan gave him every chance in the world (sound familiar) i guess i have to agree but it kind of makes me hate myself.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:09 pmby CalallenStang
Hoop Fan wrote:BLM vs Unnamed Average Ordinary Pedestrian Juco Prospect?
I'll take UAOPJP
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:11 pmby Hoop Fan
by the way Nacho, you were really grasping for straws on the 'more later' reference. Are you feeling desperate as far as SMU football goes or something? Geez, relax. You've waited 20+ years now, whats 4 or 5 more while we either start over at qb or forge ahead with a below average qb? Cmon, get happy.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:27 pmby Nacho
i honestly think this team could be so much better with a decent qb. not a great team but a pretty good one. one good enough to go 6-6. with the current o i don't see it happening. very frustrating.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:36 pmby NickSMU17
McCown would not have been able to grasp this offense just like BLM.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:34 pmby BRStang
NickSMU17 wrote:McCown would not have been able to grasp this offense just like BLM.
I did not see BLM play this week or at WSU, but it is my understanding it is not a lack of "grasping" the offense. It is a matter of talent.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:53 pmby CalallenStang
Nacho wrote:i honestly think this team could be so much better with a decent qb. not a great team but a pretty good one. one good enough to go 6-6. with the current o i don't see it happening. very frustrating.
With a decent QB, this team would be good enough to go 8-4, but probably still wouldn't because we are, after all, SMU.
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:56 pmby Stallion
yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:31 pmby CalallenStang
Stallion wrote:yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them
What if it was BLM in his 4th year, want to take a guess on how that would go?
Re: more later
Posted:
Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:36 pmby SMU21TCU10
CalallenStang wrote:Stallion wrote:yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them
What if it was BLM in his 4th year, want to take a guess on how that would go?
1-11