Page 1 of 1

Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:47 pm
by huskerpony
Army will be 3-5 if this score holds.

Assuming wins against VMI and North Texas, losses to Air Force and Navy, they will be 5-7. That opens up the Eagle Bank Bowl to C-USA.

I still think the Texas Bowl is a complete long shot, but did notice this nugget earlier in the week: K-State played two FCS teams, and you can only count 1 toward bowl eligibility. So--IF the Big 12 worked out that A&M, Baylor, Iowa State, and Colorado don't hit 6 wins, K-State would have to get 7 wins for the Big 12 to fill, which would be difficult for them (remaining games: CU, OU, KU, MU, NU.)

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:59 pm
by Stallion
17-10 Rutgers 10:00 3rd

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:59 pm
by SMU 86
Ron Ellerson has Army playing well.

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:07 pm
by CalallenStang
SMU 86 wrote:Ron Ellerson has Army playing well.


Rich, I think

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:14 pm
by Stallion
20-10 Rutgers 5:00 3rd

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:27 pm
by huskerpony
What is happening? Rutgers looks awful, but Army can't hang on to the ball!

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:31 pm
by SMU 86
CalallenStang wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:Ron Ellerson has Army playing well.


Rich, I think


You are right it is Rich Ellerson.

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:32 pm
by SMU 86
huskerpony wrote:What is happening? Rutgers looks awful, but Army can't hang on to the ball!


One thing about the triple option is that there is some much ball handling that fumble tend to happen a lot.

Re: Rutgers beating Army--Bowl Implications

PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:57 am
by Pony Soup
I HATE hoping that Army will lose