PonyFans.com

Tulsa -17

I like our chances in this game. At the very least, I say SMU covers.

damn. oddsmakers aren't impressed with our d's improvement.

I think we cover.

we've covered every game, have we not, except for WSU?

I didn't think we covered Houston. I could be wrong

No we didn't cover Houston which was 17. I covered though_ I think I was just about the only one on the board to do so although I actually came out much impressed with defensive performance

Seems like a pretty high line to me. Houston was only favored by 17 and now a 4-3 Tulsa team also gives 17. Very puzzling

Those odds makers are so darn smart.....they are good at what they do....maybe that's why they take our money so often.....

i phone money wrote:Seems like a pretty high line to me. Houston was only favored by 17 and now a 4-3 Tulsa team also gives 17. Very puzzling

You might have heard that SMU has some uncertainty at QB. That is a pretty important position.

Wuba wrote:

i phone money wrote:Seems like a pretty high line to me. Houston was only favored by 17 and now a 4-3 Tulsa team also gives 17. Very puzzling

You might have heard that SMU has some uncertainty at QB. That is a pretty important position.

So we should see the line tighten if Bo is a probable for Saturday?

ponyscott wrote:

Wuba wrote:

i phone money wrote:Seems like a pretty high line to me. Houston was only favored by 17 and now a 4-3 Tulsa team also gives 17. Very puzzling

You might have heard that SMU has some uncertainty at QB. That is a pretty important position.

So we should see the line tighten if Bo is a probable for Saturday?

yes, but not by much. maybe a 3 point swing to the good guys if BLM is probable.

Down to -15.5 at one and -16 at the other 2

all three are showing -16. No o/u or money line

I really want to bet SMU here, just think this will be a close game...

Kind of want to take the SMU money line...