Page 1 of 1

QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:57 am
by expony18
Justin Willis - 140.87
BLM - 121.8
Kyle Padron - 179.3 *

*includes his performance at houston and tulsa

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:57 am
by expony18

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:07 am
by Mustangsabu
It's a little early to talk numbers. Let's see what JJ does.

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:18 am
by expony18
Do you like Apples?

BLM
Rice L 56-27 25 for 43, 244 yds 58.1% TD 3 INT 3 2 sacks Rating 68.4 Rushing 3 for -27 Long of -9.0

Padron Padron Padron
@Tulsa W 27-13 20 for 30, 354 yds 66.7% TD 2 INT 0 Rating 187.79 Rushing 9 for 2 long of 10


Well how do you like them apples?

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:35 am
by SMUfiji43
expony18 wrote:Do you like Apples?

BLM
Rice L 56-27 25 for 43, 244 yds 58.1% TD 3 INT 3 2 sacks Rating 68.4 Rushing 3 for -27 Long of -9.0

Padron Padron Padron
@Tulsa W 27-13 20 for 30, 354 yds 66.7% TD 2 INT 0 Rating 187.79 Rushing 9 for 2 long of 10


Well how do you like them apples?


To be fair, Rice was a decent team last year. But I wholeheartedly agree with benching BLM. Let's get on the Padron train and beat the snot out of Rice

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:58 am
by Junior
One game does not a season make.

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:06 am
by expony18
SMUfiji43 wrote:
expony18 wrote:Do you like Apples?

BLM
Rice L 56-27 25 for 43, 244 yds 58.1% TD 3 INT 3 2 sacks Rating 68.4 Rushing 3 for -27 Long of -9.0

Padron Padron Padron
@Tulsa W 27-13 20 for 30, 354 yds 66.7% TD 2 INT 0 Rating 187.79 Rushing 9 for 2 long of 10


Well how do you like them apples?


To be fair, Rice was a decent team last year. But I wholeheartedly agree with benching BLM. Let's get on the Padron train and beat the snot out of Rice
to be fair tulsa went head to head with boise state and almost pulled off the upset.... just a thought

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:34 am
by The PonyGrad
Junior wrote:One game does not a season make.

Padron had a higher efficiency rating vs. Houston than BLM had in any game all season. (Do two games a season make?)

Beat Rice.

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:52 am
by Junior
The PonyGrad wrote:
Junior wrote:One game does not a season make.

Padron had a higher efficiency rating vs. Houston than BLM had in any game all season. (Do two games a season make?)

Beat Rice.


Not necessarily, but I do love the "no INT's" theme we've gone with the last few games. True, it cuts down on the number of missed tackles by our QB's, but I can live with that.

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:06 pm
by 35straight
I've never been a big fan of QB controversy, but we need to play our "Hot Hand" right now. we stick with Padron and see where it takes us. What's the worst that can happen?

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:41 pm
by expony18
UPDATED

Padron- 2 W, 0 L, 48 of 70, 729 yards, 68.6% completion, 10.4 yards/attempt, 4 TD 1 INT
Mitchell- 4 W, 15 L, 385 of 676, 4590 yards, 56.9% completion, 6.7yards/attempt, 36 TD, 33 INT

Re: QB comparison by the Numbers

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:02 pm
by HollywoodMustang
Well when ya put it THAT way.