Page 1 of 1
Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:47 pmby Stallion
* Reporter Ken Goe of the Oregonian recently unearthed this stat: Washington State did not hold the lead in regulation at any point during a season that ended 1-11. The Cougars' lone victory came in overtime, 30-27, against Southern Methodist, which, by the way, is playing in the Hawaii Bowl.
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:48 pmby smusic 00
WHYYYYYY???????
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:52 pmby RGV Pony
b/c they hired a marginal D1AA coach who took over for a coach that left the cupboard dry.
Their commitment list doesnt look bad...although it contains all of one (1) lineman for either side of the ball. Hope their OL & DL was full of underclassmen this year
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:53 pmby smusic 00
I meant to be more like....why did we lose that friggin game????? {kicking hole in wall}
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:30 pmby SMU2007
smusic 00 wrote:I meant to be more like....why did we lose that friggin game????? {kicking hole in wall}
while frustrating, winning the washington state game wouldn't have had any real impact on our season. We would still have a winning record and would still be going to the hawaii bowl. Would look nicer on our overall W's and L's though
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:36 pmby RGV Pony
a butterfly flaps its wings...who knows what wouldve happened if we'd won at WSU. Lessons learned from that game may have given us what we needed to win a game later on...holding UTEP and Tulane on late-game drives, for instance
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:44 pmby sail420s
SMU2007 wrote:while frustrating, winning the washington state game wouldn't have had any real impact on our season. We would still have a winning record and would still be going to the hawaii bowl. Would look nicer on our overall W's and L's though
It wouldn't have impacted our season, but at least we wouldn't be mentioned as the only one they beat!
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:13 pmby RE Tycoon
SMU2007 wrote:
while frustrating, winning the washington state game wouldn't have had any real impact on our season. \
Bo might still be our starter...
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:22 pmby smusic 00
sail420s wrote:SMU2007 wrote:while frustrating, winning the washington state game wouldn't have had any real impact on our season. We would still have a winning record and would still be going to the hawaii bowl. Would look nicer on our overall W's and L's though
It wouldn't have impacted our season, but at least we wouldn't be mentioned as the only one they beat!
Exactly...we are almost past the point of only popping up in the footnotes, but not quite.
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:52 pmby SMU91
RE Tycoon wrote:SMU2007 wrote:
while frustrating, winning the washington state game wouldn't have had any real impact on our season. \
Bo might still be our starter...
Padron protects the ball much better than BLM. Most likely if Kyle's QB we get a win.
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:38 pmby that's great raplh
RGV Pony wrote:a butterfly flaps its wings...who knows what wouldve happened if we'd won at WSU. Lessons learned from that game may have given us what we needed to win a game later on...holding UTEP and Tulane on late-game drives, for instance
I think we needed to lose thAt game to win the rest
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:17 pmby ponyscott
It all happened for a reason....lets just kill WSU at Ford next season so they/we stop talking about that forsaken game forever....
Re: Washington St.-Always Running Behind
Posted:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:59 pmby mrydel
Just remember, had we made one more yard against Rice 2 years ago, Phil Bennett would still be our coach. Where would we be today? I do not know, but I am happy with the direction we are going today with Jones.