by Water Pony » Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:07 am
The response by BC$ will need to provide a rational discussion on how more schools participate and are rewarded. Given their preference to give the sleeves out of their ve$ts, any openness will be narrowly defined, i.e. number of AQ conferences, number of schools with in a conference and the theortical opportunity for those outside of future BC$ alignment.
This is why the Kansas, KSU, ISU and perhaps Baylor/CO dilemma is crucial to acceptance. The same would be true to ony FB reminant from the BE, if they are parceled between Big10/11 and ACC. By these projected actions, are any current BCS schools demoted? Are any non-BCS schools promoted? What opportunities exist for the resulting non-QA conferences and their schools?
Our option appears to hope for an invitation to a newly configured BC$ conference and/or encourage the legal challenges, which are better pursued by those who are likely to be demoted. Either way feels too passive.
In a prefect world, the NCAA should reassume control over FB. Could that happen?
Pony Up