|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Hoofprint » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:17 pm
ESPN just had some radio wonk on — from a station in Nebraska, it should be noted, so he probably has a Herbie Husker tattooed somewhere — to talk about Nebraska's move to the Big 10/11.
His response suggested that part of the reasoning for the move, of course, was the big money the school will receive from the Big 10/11 network.
No kidding.
But then he talked about how the University of Nebraska is working hard to position itself as a more respected "research university" and that the Big 10/11 is "known as a research conference" (it is?), the real driving force behind the Huskers' dash to the Big 10/11 is "more academic than athletic."
I can't even believe there are people in the state of Nebraska who buy that load of crap.
Last edited by Hoofprint on Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

Hoofprint

-
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
by EastStang » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:18 pm
Close, but Baylor getting hosed and now Missouri suddenly having warts, is pretty darn funny.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12676
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by Junior » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:18 pm
Hoofprint wrote:ESPN just had some radio wonk on — from a station in Nebraska, it should be noted, so he probably has a Herbie Husker tattooed somewhere — to talk about Nebraska's move to the Big 10.
His response suggested that part of the reasoning for the move, of course, was the big money the school will receive from the Big 10/11 network.
No kidding.
But then he talked about how the University of Nebraska is working hard to position itself as a more respected "research university" and that the Big 10/11 is "known as a research conference" (it is?), the real driving force behind the Huskers' dash to the Big 10/11 is "more academic than athletic."
I can't even believe there are people in the state of Nebraska who buy that load of crap.
Not buying argument, but it is known as a research conference.
Derail the Frogs!
-

Junior

-
- Posts: 11513
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by ponyboy » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:21 pm
Anybody see the PAC commish saying how glad he was to get a great academic school like CU on board? For the general student body, yes. For the members of the football and basketball team? Not so much.
-
ponyboy

-
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
by Hoofprint » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:23 pm
Junior wrote:Hoofprint wrote:ESPN just had some radio wonk on — from a station in Nebraska, it should be noted, so he probably has a Herbie Husker tattooed somewhere — to talk about Nebraska's move to the Big 10.
His response suggested that part of the reasoning for the move, of course, was the big money the school will receive from the Big 10/11 network.
No kidding.
But then he talked about how the University of Nebraska is working hard to position itself as a more respected "research university" and that the Big 10/11 is "known as a research conference" (it is?), the real driving force behind the Huskers' dash to the Big 10/11 is "more academic than athletic."
I can't even believe there are people in the state of Nebraska who buy that load of crap.
Not buying argument, but it is known as a research conference.
OK, maybe it is known as a "research conference," but there's not a soul on the planet who thinks academics has anything to do with this move. It's about football and money, and not in that order.
-

Hoofprint

-
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
by Junior » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:24 pm
Hoofprint wrote:Junior wrote:Hoofprint wrote:ESPN just had some radio wonk on — from a station in Nebraska, it should be noted, so he probably has a Herbie Husker tattooed somewhere — to talk about Nebraska's move to the Big 10.
His response suggested that part of the reasoning for the move, of course, was the big money the school will receive from the Big 10/11 network.
No kidding.
But then he talked about how the University of Nebraska is working hard to position itself as a more respected "research university" and that the Big 10/11 is "known as a research conference" (it is?), the real driving force behind the Huskers' dash to the Big 10/11 is "more academic than athletic."
I can't even believe there are people in the state of Nebraska who buy that load of crap.
Not buying argument, but it is known as a research conference.
OK, maybe it is known as a "research conference," but there's not a soul on the planet who thinks academics has anything to do with this move. It's about football and money, and not in that order.
Yeah, that's what I agreed with you about.
Derail the Frogs!
-

Junior

-
- Posts: 11513
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by huskerpony » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:51 pm
I imagine that was probably Kevin Kugler.
The line I have heard from them--and I don't know the validity to this--is that joining the Big 10 also gets them into the "Consortium of Institutional Cooperation" or some such nonsense. It is apparently the Big 10 schools plus the University of Chicago and how they distribute research money. The word is that the money from the CIC far exceeds the money from the Big 10 Network, and that was why Harvey Perlman wanted in.
If true, it isn't that ridiculous that it was part of the decision, but it is still about money regardless of where the money comes from.
-
huskerpony

-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:07 pm
by NickSMU17 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:53 pm
U of C is still a chrter member of Big 10...they should make their comeback...
-
NickSMU17

-
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
- Location: Hinsdale, IL
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests
|
|