Page 1 of 1
Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:52 pm
by RE Tycoon
Try and put your Longhorn, Aggie, Baylor, OU, etc. hate aside and vote based on what is best for SMU.
Do you think SMU needs more time to be attractive, so therefore it is in our best interest to be as close to status quo as possible? Or, do you believe the Big 12 blowing up will enable us to align with the Big 12 leftovers, best of the MWC, and the Best of CUSA and earn AQ status?
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:00 pm
by smupony94
chaos
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:37 pm
by carolina stang
Blow it up!!
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:44 pm
by mustangxc
I do think the Big XII should do some house cleaning and possibly kick out Iowa State.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:55 pm
by davidpaul123
i think we have a shot at a "new big-12" with baylor not wanting TCU in it and a need for more texas teams to replace those who left.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:00 pm
by ponyinNC
really torn on this one...if 16 team mega conferences are starting to roll, we need to be in..period. If this is a gradual process, we may need a few years and more bowl blowouts to get some more hype and look more attractive.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:01 pm
by smupony94
2 teams have been politicking fairly heavily the past 2 weeks
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:09 pm
by jason54858
RE Tycoon wrote:Try and put your Longhorn, Aggie, Baylor, OU, etc. hate aside and vote based on what is best for SMU.
Do you think SMU needs more time to be attractive, so therefore it is in our best interest to be as close to status quo as possible? Or, do you believe the Big 12 blowing up will enable us to align with the Big 12 leftovers, best of the MWC, and the Best of CUSA and earn AQ status?
To attempt to answer your question, I truly believe if SMU continues to improve and become more attractive to the big boy conferences it will all be gravy. We are located in a great market and we have the money. We just need to expand our attendace and winning percentage. Right now we are not there, but we have great potential to be there in 2-3 years. My hope is the Big 12 finds away to stay togather to give us time to look more attractive. Because what this month showed us is the big conferences do want to expand (which is huge).
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:11 pm
by D1Football
I believe the Big 12 should stay together (or I should say 10). This will allow a better chance for SMU and TCU to join the conference in the near future. If the league dissolves and goes to the Pac-10 or SEC, there in no way SMU would be able to join in the future.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:14 pm
by Stallion
Imagine now having to explain to your girlfriend that the Big 10 has 12 teams and the Big 12 has 10 teams?
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:37 pm
by EastStang
Guys are always talking to their girlfriends about 10s being 12s.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:48 pm
by lwjr
I still believe Arkansas will be back in conference with UT if the Big 12 light stays together. Maybe go after BYU or Louisville as has already been mentioned.
Re: Poll: Should the Big 12 Break Apart or Stay at 10?

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:11 pm
by Samurai Stang
carolina stang wrote:Blow it up!!
Typical American solution.