Page 1 of 2
UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:40 pm
by Pony in SA
Just FYI at luncheon meeting today where plans and timeline for indoor facility for UTSA discussed. It will be part of new athletic fields facilities for football. Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Also, they are very excited about getting Hall. Seemed to think he is quite a player and we will miss him.
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:54 pm
by abezontar
I'm guessing nearby real estate isn't as expensive near UTSA.
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:00 pm
by couch 'em
I'm so glad East Stang thinks we don't need one. Having facilities inferior to UTSA won't hurt recruiting, right?
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:13 pm
by PK
Ahhhh...my tax dollars at work.

Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:16 pm
by smupony94
abezontar wrote:I'm guessing nearby real estate isn't as expensive near UTSA.
damn expensive. Tried to buy some. Not as expensive as near SMU though. They also have excess land the University owns.
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:15 pm
by Pony_Fan
Why cant' we use the UA Cine spot for a indoor facility? Or just hijack the one at HP when we need it

Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:20 pm
by smupony94
Pony_Fan wrote:Why cant' we use the UA Cine spot for a indoor facility? Or just hijack the one at HP when we need it

Mrs Baird's building still there?
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:46 am
by Dooby
I had heard that we approached HPHS about helping to fund their's and using it on occasion and they said, "No." Which makes sense, because a HS is likely to use a practice facility all the time for all kinds of stuff.
I think the higher cost for SMU stems from the fact that SMU won't get away with building a simple "shed" or a "bubble" in Highland Park, whereas UTSA can get away with it. SMU is going to have to build something more substantial.
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:45 am
by Bergermeister
Pony in SA wrote:Just FYI at luncheon meeting today where plans and timeline for indoor facility for UTSA discussed. It will be part of new athletic fields facilities for football. Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Also, they are very excited about getting Hall. Seemed to think he is quite a player and we will miss him.
and what does this have to do with anything SMU-related? Who cares what goes on in San Angelo?
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:54 am
by davidpaul123
this is a good little breakdown of the Big 12 facilities and their costs...
http://www.aggiesports.com/blogs/The-in ... -continues
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:03 am
by Alaric
Bergermeister wrote:Pony in SA wrote:Just FYI at luncheon meeting today where plans and timeline for indoor facility for UTSA discussed. It will be part of new athletic fields facilities for football. Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Also, they are very excited about getting Hall. Seemed to think he is quite a player and we will miss him.
and what does this have to do with anything SMU-related? Who cares what goes on in San Angelo?
Because it's an arms race. If you choose not to keep up with the Joneses, you get smashed. If you want to see what happens when you underspend and take the high road on academics, look no further than the abject failure that was 1989-2007.
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:17 am
by smupony94
Bergermeister wrote:Pony in SA wrote:Just FYI at luncheon meeting today where plans and timeline for indoor facility for UTSA discussed. It will be part of new athletic fields facilities for football. Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Also, they are very excited about getting Hall. Seemed to think he is quite a player and we will miss him.
and what does this have to do with anything SMU-related? Who cares what goes on in San Angelo?
When did UTSA move to San Angelo?
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:42 am
by abezontar
smupony94 wrote:Bergermeister wrote:Pony in SA wrote:Just FYI at luncheon meeting today where plans and timeline for indoor facility for UTSA discussed. It will be part of new athletic fields facilities for football. Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Also, they are very excited about getting Hall. Seemed to think he is quite a player and we will miss him.
and what does this have to do with anything SMU-related? Who cares what goes on in San Angelo?
When did UTSA move to San Angelo?
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:45 am
Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:01 pm
by jtstang
Pony in SA wrote:Cost to build not as much as one would think and can be completed in relatively short time period. My guess is they will have one done before us.
Turns out you were right, not much money to build and they had it before us.

Re: UTSA's Indoor Facility

Posted:
Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:03 pm
by Pony in SA
PK wrote:Ahhhh...my tax dollars at work.

Proposal to be privately funded. Red McCombs, Tom Benson, Bill Greehey (former Valero CEO) and others will come up with cash. I am sure SMU could do the same, just need to get the location and start it. I am hoping the powers to be are working on it now behind the scenes.