PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:05 pmPage 1 of 1
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:47 pmTHE NUMBER IS NOW TWELVE. For a conference that used to be the Pac-8, they sure are resisting changing the "10" to "12"
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:04 pmCalallenStang wrote:THE NUMBER IS NOW TWELVE. For a conference that used to be the Pac-8, they sure are resisting changing the "10" to "12"
Won't officially be 12 until next year and then they will change the logo.
They won't play the Big Televen game.
BTW where is "THE GENERAL"?
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:06 pmHB Pony Dad wrote:CalallenStang wrote:THE NUMBER IS NOW TWELVE. For a conference that used to be the Pac-8, they sure are resisting changing the "10" to "12"
Won't officially be 12 until next year and then they will change the logo.
They won't play the Big Televen game.
BTW where is "THE GENERAL"?
Seems pretty ridiculous to change the logo for one season only.
And I think OC Mustang said that the General decided to focus more on his family, etc.
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:17 pmLooks like a comic book hero's logo or something. How goofy looking.
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:49 pmSome consulting / Marketing firm made a lot of $$$ coming up with that.
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:52 pmThe Pac 10: It's almost football!
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:27 pmI guess the point is the 10 is on the way up?
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:31 pmJust a complete guess... I think the A has some mountain meaning with the inclusion of mountain state members Colorado and Utah.
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:14 pmIt still needs to be determined whether Utah and Colorado football begins in 2011 or 2012.
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:30 pmWater Pony wrote:It still needs to be determined whether Utah and Colorado football begins in 2011 or 2012.
Utah joins in '11 and Colorado will probably join at the same time as well. The Buffs' paperwork just needs to be finalized. http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.co ... ost-sense/
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:15 amCA Mustang wrote:Water Pony wrote:It still needs to be determined whether Utah and Colorado football begins in 2011 or 2012.
Utah joins in '11 and Colorado will probably join at the same time as well. The Buffs' paperwork just needs to be finalized. http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.co ... ost-sense/
Colorado has to go, their money has already been spent by the Big XII-2
Re: PAC-10 re-brands
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:44 pmHere is an interesting article about the PAC 10 new commissioner and his future plans including the logo:
Led by savvy commissioner Larry Scott, Pac-10 rebrands its image
The Pac-10 just unveiled a sleeker, more dynamic logo featuring a wave rolling into a mountain.
Led by savvy commissioner Larry Scott, Pac-10 rebrands its image
The Pac-10 just unveiled a sleeker, more dynamic logo featuring a wave rolling into a mountain.
So designers chose a mountain and wave, which symbolize not only the Pac-10's geographic footprint but also its strength. Mountains can't be moved, except maybe by waves. It didn't hurt that mountains also provide the backdrop at Colorado and Utah, the conference's two newest schools.
Another priority was a mark that could accommodate various hues so schools could customize the logo with their own color schemes. PAC had to pop off the logo, because Scott has ordered his staff to de-emphasize the use of the word "Pacific."