Page 1 of 1

Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:07 pm
by Water Pony
MWC / CUSA / WAC Restructure into a nationwide CUSA
1. TCU decides that it can't stay in MWC
2. Hawai'i wants to go independent
3. CUSA - East picks up a team, e.g. Temple
4. Air Force* has choice of CUSA West or Central (a new SWC)
5. New Mexico schools and UTEP align
6. La Tech** has choice of CUSA Central or West
7. If another Texas school, like UT San Antonio qualifies in the future, add them to Central
8. Offer Army and Navy flexible FB memberships or play-in opportunities
9. 2 Game Championship Series for 3 Division Winners, plus highest ranked #2
10. CUSA Winner gets spot among 5 Bowls, perhaps Cotton.

MWC/WAC Merge into CUSA - West or Mountain Division
- Boise State
- Idaho
- Fresno State
- San Jose State
- San Diego State
- Nevada
- UNLV
- Utah State
- Wyoming
- Colorado State
- Air Force*


CUSA - Central or a new SWC
- New Mexico
- New Mexico State
- UTEP
- Tulsa
- TCU
- SMU
- Houston
- Rice

CUSA - East
- La Tech**
- Tulane
- So. Miss
- Memphis
- UAB
- UCF
- Marshall
- ECU
- Temple - New Member

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:12 pm
by 03Mustang
Can't we stop this now that there are actual games to watch?

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:13 pm
by huskerpony
From the thread title, I thought you were looking for a prescription.

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:21 pm
by GeorgiaMustang
03Mustang wrote:Can't we stop this now that there are actual games to watch?



I second this notion. Live this season as it is

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:27 pm
by Samurai Stang
A 28 team CUSA? I am not one to stifle creativity, but this will never happen. It is far too large, and maintains all of the weaker schools that are best left behind. There are far too many problems to go into detail regarding all of them.

There is, however, one of your propositions which I will give particular attention to. UT San Antonio is not a program that SMU needs to build. If SMU ever wishes to leave behind CUSA and join an AQ conference, then it must not decrease its value. To add UT San Antonio would be to add another program in a large city with access to Texas recruiting. Large state schools are more attractive than smaller private schools, which means that were SMU to elevate UT San Antonio, SMU would be doing so at the expense of itself. Furthermore, UT San Antonio is not even Division One at this time. Taking a school directly from a lesser field of play and immediately associating it with ourselves makes us seem desperate.

Have you ever wondered why SMU does not want North Texas in its conference? The same rules apply to UT San Antonio. We would only lose standing from deeming them our conference equals.

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:48 pm
by Pony_Fan
please stop the madness

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:59 am
by Mestengo
My head hurts.

Re: Plan B

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:05 am
by EastStang
As has been pointed out before, every time a conference realignment thread is started a little kitten dies. Way to go.