Page 1 of 2
Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:16 am
by couch 'em
If we don't get Moore back out there, we aren't going bowling. Is that Bennie Thomas who has ", III" on his jersey? He was getting abused and should have been abused more. If Washington State was any better it would have been like that OSU game a few years back where they set the single game TD record on us.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:58 am
by Big C
Yes. Bennie Thomas III. Every reciever had at least a foot on the poor guy. They wiped the turf with him.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:38 am
by Mestengo
I'm going to watch the replay after a bit.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:57 am
by that's great raplh
This game without Moore is very beneficial to developing depth b
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:01 pm
by davidpaul123
One of the main reasons we are blitzing so much so we dont give the QB time to expose our suspect secondary.
Moore is key to us beating teams that are any good. Still think we could scrape by with what we got and get to a bowl, but it definately would not be us heading to the CUSA championship.
I dont even want to talk about Beanie. Everyone clammoring for Parks should take a look at that pass play near the end of the game. Im not sure we have a whole lot of options here. I like the idea of moving one of the safeties out since we seem to have more depth there.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:39 pm
by gostangs
Im sure he is a great guy and all - but if we roll him out there Friday night we might as well head to the house.... 5-8 corners do not work vs anyone - wait till Houton sees tape on our corners - they'll get giddy.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:40 pm
by Pony_Fan
we have had short corners for the last 10 yrs. It is maddening.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:58 pm
by reddevil
Is Parks redshirting this year? Maybe time to see what Acker can do at CB.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:01 pm
by Stallion
Parks got beat on the bomb
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:08 pm
by reddevil
So much for bigger CB's
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:07 pm
by SMU 86
Parks will be fine. He is just a freshman. Just needs more time to get use to the college game.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:09 pm
by ThadFilms
Quick somebody call up Flanigan and see how we can squeeze some more eligibility out of McCann.
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:47 pm
by SmooTen
This forum has always been amusing to me. So now i think i will finally be able to put some of these so called "football guru's analyses" to rest lol. I can already tell just by reading this post alone this is going to be fun and very easy lol

Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:58 pm
by couch 'em
SmooTen wrote:This forum has always been amusing to me. So now i think i will finally be able to put some of these so called "football guru's analyses" to rest lol. I can already tell just by reading this post alone this is going to be fun and very easy lol

So..... you disagree that Bennie Thomas, III was getting completely abused by WSU and that Sterling Moore is great?
Re: Moore = Bowl

Posted:
Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:02 pm
by SmooTen
Now, if you payed attention to the game, you would know Thomas DIDNT get abused during the game. I believe it was 1 deep ball that was caught on him and had that p.i. call. Thats not being abused. Granted they do have a foot of height on him, but exactly what does that mean? Last i checked most dbs are smaller than opposing receivers. The secondary is not suspect, they are just young. Only moore and banjo have LEGIT playing time. So understand being under the lights for some is still a little new people. Lol and the height thing...give me a break. Its hard to find a TALL CORNER, because they get moved to the other side of the ball or dont like hitting people or moved to safety. Trust me...there is a reason you dont see them that often.