Page 1 of 1
by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:27 am
by Nacho
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:33 am
by Harry0569
I said Dobbs would throw b/w 13-18 passes, looks like I won a prize from '94. I think both teams will score more than 14 each.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:54 am
by Nacho
maybe they are counting on another monsoon.
interesting site. i am constantly amazed at what is on the internet.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:57 am
by Harry0569
Nacho wrote:maybe they are counting on another monsoon.
interesting site. i am constantly amazed at what is on the internet.
Yeah it's pretty spiffy..I'm going to have to remember those numbers so I can impress people at the SMU watching party with my expansive statistical knowledge of the game.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:58 am
by Stallion
did this computer simulated result factor in blocked kicks playing a crucial part in 5 out of the last 12 wins in two years. That might break the tie. Football is a funny game.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:19 am
by ponyboy
Good point and it's not just blocked kicks but the specter of a blocked kick. Changes the way teams make on field decisions against us.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:28 pm
by Nacho
has anyone tried a fake fg against us this year? seems like the logical thing to do. i wouldn't try a fg against us. i would go for it on 4th or a fake anytime in fg range. getting a fg returned for a td is a killer.
Re: by the numbers

Posted:
Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:10 pm
by mrydel
With our fg blocking success I am certain that the kids are told to be very alert for a fake. Only one I readily recall is UTEP last year and they were stopped cold.