Page 1 of 1
Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:42 am
by The PonyGrad
Possible good news:
SMU will practice Monday through Thursday during its bye week and most of the banged-up players could return by Marshall – that includes senior cornerback Sterling Moore, who has missed the last four games to a knee injury. His return could give SMU's beleaguered secondary a huge lift.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... fe9de.html
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:30 pm
by Mestengo
Good - read
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:41 pm
by Stallion
Why bother since many on this board seem to think 1 play in 1 game DOOMED the entire season. What's all this about June Jones expecting the Offense and Defense to make big plays when they have to.
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:42 pm
by peruna81
in spite of her rejection of one of our own, a very well written piece...our offense still hasn't reached the potential threshold
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:24 pm
by ponyscott
Maybe this is what Kyle Padron should do to get yards for SMU......This is amazing. A middle school quarterback at Driscoll middle school in CC Texas pulls off the trick play of the year. He pretends to walk off his own five yard penalty after being handed the ball and then runs into the end zone.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/5131 ... -it#page/2
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:54 pm
by Mestengo
Let's call it the walk away

Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:57 pm
by George S. Patton
Stallion wrote:Why bother since many on this board seem to think 1 play in 1 game DOOMED the entire season. What's all this about June Jones expecting the Offense and Defense to make big plays when they have to.
Funny how attorneys have a tendency to focus in on one event that will build a case in their favor....hmmmm. Now, they will build a series of events off that one the event. But it usually goes back to that one event.
Which is kinda what that other thread CLEARLY explained during the discussion.
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:58 am
by Stallion
I'm calling out the idiots that claimed 1 play (out of 150+ plays) in 1 game "flipped" the season. You would be No. 1 since you coined the term "flipped the season".
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:01 am
by George S. Patton
I guess reading comprehension skills are lost on you. That's disappointing.
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:06 am
by ponyinNC
let the educational smack talk begin!!
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:09 am
by Stallion
Reading comprehension is just fine. You were the one to use the overly dramatic, pessimistic statement that 1 play "flipped the season" in your Title:
"Did the season flip on one play?"
Perhaps your writing skills need work.
Re: Hairopoulos: Lack of playmaking continues to hurt SMU FB

Posted:
Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:25 am
by George S. Patton
How do you know that 1 play didn't flip the season? How do I know it did?
As I recall, the title of that threat was written in question form. I then offered my take because the sequence that has followed since that event has not been very good regarding SMU football.
Coincidence? Perhaps
I have no problem with you arguing against the point. The topic sparked a debate, which you were a willing participant. You could have ignored the thread and not offered an opinion. But you did. That's why we're still talking about it.
Now, I think you make yourself look a little silly that when you claim people are idiots because it's impossible to think one play turned the season in a different direction. I guess if you want to go down that road rather than just simply disagreeing, that's your call.
That's never happened in the history of sports?
Like the Bill Buckner misplay of the ground ball in Game 6 of the 1986 World Series. You know that game only tied the series at 3-3. So the Red Sox still could have won in 7. Why didn't they? Did the Mets have the momentum? I believe they rallied from a 3-0 deficit in Game 7 to win.
Did the Dwight Clark catch against the Cowboys change the fortunes of the Cowboys in the 1980s and the 49ers in the 1980s? How many World Titles did Dallas win in that decade? How many did San Francisco win in that decade? Coincidence?
Did Michael Jordan's buzzer-beater in the playoffs against Cleveland help accelerate the Chicago Bulls into their great championship runs? "Pundits" have argued that it did.
I would suggest that just because you say it doesn't make it true. That's the same with me. It's opinions. And that's all they are.