PonyFans.com

Category and differential in rank

Rushing yards per carry SMU + 13
Pass Eff, SMU +19
3rd down conversions, Army +23 (47.6% vs. 43.3%)
TFLs, slight edge on O and D to Army
Total Defense in YPP SMU + 32
Rush D in YPC, SMU +32
Pass Eff D, SMU +14

Punts, Advantage Army
KOR, Even
FG, guessing advantage us since the Army FG kicker is only making 2/3 of kicks.

Looks like overall advantage SMU except that in terms of Turnovers it is Army + 96

I like the way you give details behind the differentials that favor Army, but not the ones that favor SMU.

BeatNavy wrote:I like the way you give details behind the differentials that favor Army, but not the ones that favor SMU.

Actually I gave one detail for each if you count the FG completion % as negative re Army.

For those that like the details:
Rushing yards per carry SMU + 13 (#28 vs. #41, 4.85 vs. 4.59)
Pass Eff, SMU +19 (#45 vs. #64, 135.2 vs. 127.5)
3rd down conversions, Army +23 (47.6% vs. 43.3%)
TFLs, slight edge on O and D to Army, very close
Total Defense in YPP SMU + 32 (#39 vs. #71, 5.1 vs. 5.68 )
Rush D in YPC, SMU +32 (#38 vs. #70, 3.66 vs. 4.31)
Pass Eff D, SMU +14 (#57 vs. #71, 126.4 vs. 131.

Punts, Advantage Army
Net Punting, Army #58, SMU #88
Punt Returns, Army #72, SMU #104
KOR, Even (SMU #53, Army #108, but defending KOR Army #26, SMU #110)
FG, guessing advantage us since the Army FG kicker is only making 2/3 of kicks.

Looks like overall advantage SMU except that in terms of Turnovers it is Army + 96
Army #12, SMU #108 or 1.00 vs. -.69

bump

The Navy game did not change the season stats in any significant way.

Army passed a bit better than their season average.

Since bowl talk is heating up.... bump