CFN's Pete Fiutak's take on 1980s SMU

… Nice timing, kids. What better after an hour long dance around the elephant in the room than a documentary about SMU in the 1980s?
But it would be far more entertaining than the one about the USFL … I’m really, really, really hoping ESPN doesn’t end up debuting, “30 for 30: $cam Newton,†after the 2015 Heisman presentation.
The “Pony Excess†documentary did a great job of going through the particulars of just how corrupt and just how dumb the SMU administrators were, but it didn’t effectively convey how bad the program was before it started systematically paying players. (Oddly enough, the best current example of the same sort of meteoric rise would probably be Stanford, going from miserable to a stepping-stone year to the national title debate in a hiccup.) The doc also failed to address one huge, glaring point about the program that went 45-5-1 from 1980 to 1984 ...
SMU didn’t beat anyone.
Let’s not romanticize the Southwest Conference too much; towards the end, the league wasn’t the dominant force that old-schoolers make it out to be. The Mustangs were Boise State with an all-world nose tackle (Michael Carter) and all-timer running backs (Eric Dickerson and Craig James).
The first huge recruiting class cut its teeth with a 5-6 1979 season, and then in 1980, when things started to come together, the Mustangs went 8-4 with just four wins over teams that finished with a winning record. The best win of the bunch was over an overrated Texas squad that finished 7-5.
The 1981 team that didn’t get to go to a bowl game, but won the SWC title and beat four teams that finished with a winning record, with the best victory the season-ender over a decent, but not elite Arkansas team, to finish 10-1. The one loss came against the one great team on the slate, Texas.
About that supposedly dominant 11-0-1 team that some still think should’ve won the 1982 national title, check out the final records of the teams the Mustangs beat: Tulane (4-7), UTEP (2-10), TCU (3-8), North Texas (2-9), Baylor (4-6-1), Houston (5-5-1), Texas (9-3), Texas A&M (5-6), Rice (0-11), and Texas Tech (4-7). Four of those games (TCU, Baylor, Houston, and Texas Tech) were nailbiters against bad teams with SMU winning all four by seven points or fewer and three of them in the final moments. Outside of the win over Texas, the only other game of note was against Arkansas, who had one of the nation’s best defenses, in a 17-17 tie. The 7-3 ice bowl win over Pitt in the Cotton Bowl wasn’t exactly convincing for a team that simply wasn’t that great.
…Yes, everyone was doing the same stuff that SMU did, especially in the Southwest Conference, and yes, the NCAA did make an example out of the program, but going nuclear worked. Verne Lundquist put it best when he said that the NCAA wasn’t going to apply the Death Penalty again except for extreme circumstances, but it also made its statement in a case where it was absolutely justified in dropping the hammer. SMU was given second and third chances, and the place still kept screwing up. Of course the other schools in the Southwest Conference should’ve been hit harder, but no one surrounding the SMU situation has any right for whining about getting nailed with a ticket even though everyone was speeding. The Mustangs happened to be going 183 miles per hour in the wrong lane.
To bring it home, and to try to fight through the Cam Fatigue, this is why there’s such an uproar over the lack of punishment in any way for the Newton Family Fun Time. The NCAA always, always, always, thinks about the precedent it’s setting, and it’ll always, always, always go out of its way to make a point with the future in mind.
But it would be far more entertaining than the one about the USFL … I’m really, really, really hoping ESPN doesn’t end up debuting, “30 for 30: $cam Newton,†after the 2015 Heisman presentation.
The “Pony Excess†documentary did a great job of going through the particulars of just how corrupt and just how dumb the SMU administrators were, but it didn’t effectively convey how bad the program was before it started systematically paying players. (Oddly enough, the best current example of the same sort of meteoric rise would probably be Stanford, going from miserable to a stepping-stone year to the national title debate in a hiccup.) The doc also failed to address one huge, glaring point about the program that went 45-5-1 from 1980 to 1984 ...
SMU didn’t beat anyone.
Let’s not romanticize the Southwest Conference too much; towards the end, the league wasn’t the dominant force that old-schoolers make it out to be. The Mustangs were Boise State with an all-world nose tackle (Michael Carter) and all-timer running backs (Eric Dickerson and Craig James).
The first huge recruiting class cut its teeth with a 5-6 1979 season, and then in 1980, when things started to come together, the Mustangs went 8-4 with just four wins over teams that finished with a winning record. The best win of the bunch was over an overrated Texas squad that finished 7-5.
The 1981 team that didn’t get to go to a bowl game, but won the SWC title and beat four teams that finished with a winning record, with the best victory the season-ender over a decent, but not elite Arkansas team, to finish 10-1. The one loss came against the one great team on the slate, Texas.
About that supposedly dominant 11-0-1 team that some still think should’ve won the 1982 national title, check out the final records of the teams the Mustangs beat: Tulane (4-7), UTEP (2-10), TCU (3-8), North Texas (2-9), Baylor (4-6-1), Houston (5-5-1), Texas (9-3), Texas A&M (5-6), Rice (0-11), and Texas Tech (4-7). Four of those games (TCU, Baylor, Houston, and Texas Tech) were nailbiters against bad teams with SMU winning all four by seven points or fewer and three of them in the final moments. Outside of the win over Texas, the only other game of note was against Arkansas, who had one of the nation’s best defenses, in a 17-17 tie. The 7-3 ice bowl win over Pitt in the Cotton Bowl wasn’t exactly convincing for a team that simply wasn’t that great.
…Yes, everyone was doing the same stuff that SMU did, especially in the Southwest Conference, and yes, the NCAA did make an example out of the program, but going nuclear worked. Verne Lundquist put it best when he said that the NCAA wasn’t going to apply the Death Penalty again except for extreme circumstances, but it also made its statement in a case where it was absolutely justified in dropping the hammer. SMU was given second and third chances, and the place still kept screwing up. Of course the other schools in the Southwest Conference should’ve been hit harder, but no one surrounding the SMU situation has any right for whining about getting nailed with a ticket even though everyone was speeding. The Mustangs happened to be going 183 miles per hour in the wrong lane.
To bring it home, and to try to fight through the Cam Fatigue, this is why there’s such an uproar over the lack of punishment in any way for the Newton Family Fun Time. The NCAA always, always, always, thinks about the precedent it’s setting, and it’ll always, always, always go out of its way to make a point with the future in mind.