New Adidas Uniforms 2011

by **SMU1523** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:21 pm

I just saw this on my Facebook Newsfeed from the Adidas Football page.

by **couch 'em** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:28 pm

Looks sharp

by **NavyCrimson** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:40 pm

Well -

1. The pant stripes appear to be larger. Good move. They appear symmetrical with the helmet now.

2. Those ridiculous stripes on the jersey. Stupid, silly look'n.

3. 'SMU' on front of jersey. WAY TOO SMALL!!! (Are they embarrassed???)

4. White Socks. Thank the Good LORD!!!

5. Black shoes. OK but "white" 80's-style would be great, too.

6. Red Jersey. Too bad not school color - crimson.

Overall - some improvement.

by **SMU1523** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:44 pm

I have a strong feeling will still have the black socks...and I do hope the SMU font is larger on the actual uniform

by **Junior** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:53 pm

SMU1523 wrote:I have a strong feeling will still have the black socks...and I do hope the SMU font is larger on the actual uniform

agree on both couts.

willing to bet while socks were used for contrast purposes to highlight the cleats since it's a shoe ad.

by **skyscraper** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:03 pm

I am happy with this.
Considering what Arizona State rolled out a few days ago, things could have been similarly horrible.

by **FroggieFever** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:52 pm

by **mrydel** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:04 pm

I hope they run out of stripes some day.

by **BIGHORSE** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:19 pm

FroggieFever wrote:

If we had all those red and blue stripes they would still look better than the purple puke.

and another thing, the girl in your picture is really a Kansas State girl.

by **mrydel** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:22 pm

I thought she was a Baltimore Raven girl.

by **RGV Pony** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:40 pm

thought she was an LSU girl

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:43 pm

NavyCrimson wrote:Well -

1. The pant stripes appear to be larger. Good move. They appear symmetrical with the helmet now.

2. Those ridiculous stripes on the jersey. Stupid, silly look'n.

3. 'SMU' on front of jersey. WAY TOO SMALL!!! (Are they embarrassed???)

4. White Socks. Thank the Good LORD!!!

5. Black shoes. OK but "white" 80's-style would be great, too.

6. Red Jersey. Too bad not school color - crimson.

Overall - some improvement.

Good grief. They're fine.

by **smudubs** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:31 pm

I pray that the players don't focus as much on uniforms as people on this board do. Get a quality product on the field and it doesn't matter what they wear. Uniform discussions seem petty but then again we don't have much better to talk about until fall so why should I care.

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:53 pm

mrydel wrote:I thought she was a Baltimore Raven girl.

Northwestern?

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:56 pm

I'm going to dare to be different when I say I'm going to actually wait and see what the FINISHED product is when the school announces ANY uniform change. Do we even know that there is an actual change coming?