PonyFans.com

I just thought Ild check frog board.......

http://www.killerfrogs.com/msgboard/ind ... 38451&st=0

God I would rather read one of Mitche's posts than that purple passion.

Peruna wrote:You're a glutton for punishment, aren't you?

Well I'm an SMU fan....

Lmao

They sure are full of themselves.

you don't think SMU fans would be "full of themselves" if we were enjoying the success TCU has had in recent years? back to back BCS games? Do you think we will ever accomplish that? Not even many of the big boys have that on their resume. It's actually an advantage Boise and TCU have had (winning a relatively weak conference to qualify). TCU should have a better shot of winning the Big East than they ever would have the Big XII.

I'm no TCU lover, but I give them credit for what they've accomplished...and I REALLY want our guys to kick their arses this year!

CoxMustangFan wrote:I've never seen so much arrogance born from so little success -- it's absolutely epic. If they had 15 more straight years of high-level success they still wouldn't have earned the position they think they're in today.

Congrats to them for their hard work and success (and thank you for showing it's possible). However, keep that infection on their board.

Interesting ... that post didn't strike me as arrogant. I thought the comparison between the pain induced by Mitch's posts and any pro-Frog talk was funny.

CoxMustangFan wrote:I don't want to turn this into a TCU bashing thread as that just gets tiresome. However, I agree with you that TCU's domination of a weak non-BCS will help SMU. Their continued domination of a sad BCS football conference will be ugly. TCU would have been Baylor 2.0 in the Big 12 (10).

I'd rather not bash TCU at the moment either (though it is fun, I just don't want to take the time to develop new insults and we have done the old ones to death). If TCU took a Big XII invitation rather than a BE invitation they would still be light years ahead of Baylor. TCU built their program over a 10-12 year period and taught their players to compete and then win. Baylor has been the sweetheart of the Big XII correctional system for years.

I hate purple and I don't hate anything.

One Trick Pony wrote:I hate purple and I don't hate anything.

[deleted] TCU

CoxMustangFan wrote:I've never seen so much arrogance born from so little success -- it's absolutely epic. If they had 15 more straight years of high-level success they still wouldn't have earned the position they think they're in today.

Congrats to them for their hard work and success (and thank you for showing it's possible). However, keep that infection on their board.

smu fball record 439-477-54 (.480); 5-7-1 bowl record; 11 conference titles; 1 national championship; 1 Heisman winner

TCU fball record 581-512-57 (.530); 12-14-1 bowl record; 17 conference titles; 2 national championships; 1 Heisman winner

If TCU has so little success, what do you call smu's?

Go away froggie

ya wrote:

CoxMustangFan wrote:I've never seen so much arrogance born from so little success -- it's absolutely epic. If they had 15 more straight years of high-level success they still wouldn't have earned the position they think they're in today.

Congrats to them for their hard work and success (and thank you for showing it's possible). However, keep that infection on their board.

smu fball record 439-477-54 (.480); 5-7-1 bowl record; 11 conference titles; 1 national championship; 1 Heisman winner

TCU fball record 581-512-57 (.530); 12-14-1 bowl record; 17 conference titles; 2 national championships; 1 Heisman winner

If TCU has so little success, what do you call smu's?

We call it masochism. We willingly forfeited 25 years worth of being competitive. SMU's record comes with asterisks.

If you count the 25 years we didnt play and figure we would have been a 500 team, thats about 150 w/l swing...

Putting us almost exactly with TCU...


We still win the beauty pageant and IQ exam...