Page 1 of 1

Championships without cheating?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:51 pm
by HB Pony Dad
Using SMU's death penalty as a jumping-off point, big-time football in 2011 looks as dirty as ever. Almost half of the current Football Bowl Subdivision schools (56) have committed a major violation in football since 1987. There have been 72 cases involving major violations, averaging three major cases per year. The "leaders" in that category are Texas Tech and Alabama, each suffering major penalties on three separate occasions.

In the previous 24 years (1963-1987), there were 89 major cases. Narrow the focus to the decade of the 1980s, when there were 54 such cases in only 10 years. That's 55 percent more per year than the 1987-2011 sampling. While many years can separate a violation and a championship, the numbers are connected by a common pursuit -- the pressure to win at the top level. Not surprisingly, 44 of those 56 schools since 1987 are from BCS conferences (based on 2010 alignment).

Sort of like a scarlet letter -- with benefits. Or, to borrow a NASCAR term, if you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin.'


Championships without cheating? History is against it

Re: Championships without cheating?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:13 pm
by Water Pony
http://articles.philly.com/2011-06-21/s ... oe-paterno

Philadelphia Daily News - Nate Mink - Jun 21, 2011

Paterno's football program and Krzyzewski's basketball program practically mirror one another, striking a balance between winning and upholding integrity ...

JoePa and Coach K impart words of wisdom in ESPN taping. Are they models? Joe Pa for sure.

Re: Championships without cheating?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:18 pm
by Water Pony
CBS Sports Report:

Major NCAA violations yield relatively minor consequences

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... nsequences

Re: Championships without cheating?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:25 am
by EastStang
And because we now are really anal about not cheating, we end up in a competitive disadvantage. Unfortunately, when you have more cheaters in FBS than non-cheaters, then they begin to follow the gangsters code, don't be a rat. And because they are the programs with the $$$$$ if they do get caught, they pretty much can weather any penalty because as the article points out, who is going to kick Alabama, LSU, or Auburn off TV. I don't think the NCAA will ever grow a pair, and SMU can't cheat again. So, I guess we'll just keep doing the best that we can under the current situation and say that we have kept our integrity.