Page 1 of 2
KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:56 am
by SMU89
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:45 am
by NomAnor
I havent voted this many times for the same thing since Bush took office
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:56 am
by Dr Death
NomAnor wrote:I havent voted this many times for the same thing since Bush took office
It won't let me vote more than once, even after refreshing and going back and re-clicking the link. But I did notice the vote totals after I voted. You've gotta love
Air Force being in there twice. One has them w/
31 votes and
4% and the other says
39 votes and
5%.
WTF???
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:33 am
by NomAnor
I just cant see a military school getting in .Heck they put weight restrictions on the players
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:41 am
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
Dr Death wrote:
It won't let me vote more than once, even after refreshing and going back and re-clicking the link. But I did notice the vote totals after I voted. You've gotta love Air Force being in there twice. One has them w/ 31 votes and 4% and the other says 39 votes and 5%.
WTF???
The Air Force is more powerful when they operate on multiple fronts.
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:44 am
by NickSMU17
Problem with academies is that they can really be a ball buster in BCS hunt....
Having to take a week to prepare for option offense and possible injuries...A team with BCS title hopes doesn't want to risk playing these guys year in and year out...
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:02 am
by NomAnor
Any true BCS team should have no trouble handling an option attack.I remeber a few years ago LSU played a team like that.Playing against the option was a different look but you just cant beat good talent and good coaching with new look stuff
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:05 am
by NickSMU17
It has nothing to do with winning more than they lose..they will win 8 out of 10...Its the preparation, and injury risk....and that 10-20% shot they get upset...
Ask OSU if they liked playing Navy couple years ago....then ask them if they would like to play them with better recruits due to AQ status...You think a lot of people are pining to play GA. Tech
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:00 am
by NomAnor
i hear ya but still nothing wrong with shaking things up keep every one on there toes.Does rice still run that option
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:01 am
by NickSMU17
no...
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:03 am
by NomAnor
If you have some good speed on def it will crush The old style rushing attacks almost every time
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:45 pm
by SMU 86
I voted. We are not to far behind BYU for the lead.
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:36 pm
by skyscraper
2nd place and only 3% behind BYU. Well done. Keep voting.
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:33 pm
by SMU 86
Somehow Houston has passed us up for 2nd place. But we are less than 40 votes away from first place. We can do it.
Re: KC Star on expansion options

Posted:
Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:43 pm
by S....M....U
just voted on my ipad and computer...only 10 back from houston and 24 back from BYU
vote vote vote