Mike Sherman post game

by **SMU89** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:04 pm

http://www.kbtx.com/sports/headlines/Ag ... 46003.html

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:18 am

Very classy.

by **ponyfan777** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:21 am

Well put and Go Ponies~

by **ThunderStang** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:02 am

Wow. New respect for both Sherman and Tannehill. Great to see such class in their post-game comments concerning SMU. Here's hoping their TOP-25 predictions hold true.

by **RyanSMU98** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:07 am

Very classy answers. And you heard it from Sherman first: "They'll be a top 20 team at the end of the year"! Now let's go get it!

by **Junior** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:15 am

I suspected nothing less from Sherman. I've always heard he's a good guy. He had his team focused on the game and not all the distractions.

by **Insane_Pony_Posse** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:25 am

Wow....nice comments about SMU by Coach Sherman.
Patterson @ TCU could take a lesson in class from Coach Sherman.

by **ponydawg** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:32 am

But doesn't he want his W to seem as legit as possible.

by **Charleston Pony** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 5:37 pm

this guy is "getting it done" at A$M. Once they join the SEC...watch out Whorns

by **redpony** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 5:46 pm

Classy comments from those interviewed. Nice that we at least got a little respect (although a win would have been better

).

GO PONIES!!!

by **tristatecoog** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:03 pm

The failed onside kick seemed to be a momentum killer, especially after A&M went up two TDs.

I think the "top 20" comment was a bit disingenuous. I agree that it was a very good win for A&M. They probably played above themselves in this game, and SMU seemed to wear down over the course of the game. If you beat a team by 32, score 26 unanswered and don't allow the opponent to score for nearly three quarters, how is that a top 20 team?

McDermott looked pretty solid as did Line (128 yds) and some of the receivers. The Aggie OL created nice holes for the backs and the secondary seemed to play off the receivers. The Aggie D also seemed to crank it up as time went on.

by **GiddyUp** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:09 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:this guy is "getting it done" at A$M. Once they join the SEC...watch out Whorns

Um, watch out Horns NOW

by **redpony** » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:15 am

Yep- we obviously have a lot of work to do. We can start the improvements with crushing UTEP this week.

GO PONIES!!!

by PK » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:36 am

tristatecoog wrote:The failed onside kick seemed to be a momentum killer, especially after A&M went up two TDs.

I think the "top 20" comment was a bit disingenuous. I agree that it was a very good win for A&M. They probably played above themselves in this game, and SMU seemed to wear down over the course of the game. If you beat a team by 32, score 26 unanswered and don't allow the opponent to score for nearly three quarters, how is that a top 20 team?

McDermott looked pretty solid as did Line (128 yds) and some of the receivers. The Aggie OL created nice holes for the backs and the secondary seemed to play off the receivers. The Aggie D also seemed to crank it up as time went on.

I may be wrong, but it looked to me that A&M kept most of their starting line up in all the way to the end of the game. There is no law that says they shouldn't, but...