SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

by **Ponymon** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:55 pm

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:07 pm

That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.

Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?

by **smupony94** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:08 pm

Code for EJ leaked confidential information about SMU

by **ObeyMyDog** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:09 pm

That's that real good SEC English

Means they can do whatever the hell they want

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:19 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering MISSOURI strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.

Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?

Here you go.

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:23 pm

mrydel wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering MISSOURI strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.

Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?

Here you go.

Did you learn how to translate that from living amongst the Hog fans?

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:27 pm

by **GRGB** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:39 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.

Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?

by **smubrooks** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:44 pm

I believe ther are saying "We're going to pick SMU but nobody will believe us when we say it and everyone in Mizzou might commit suicide so we are holding off for now"

by **smupony94** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:56 pm

SEC move could generate $12 million a year more for Mizzou

A Missouri move to the SEC could generate as much as $12 million more in annual TV revenue, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press.

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/f ... z1aPWPh0zK

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:36 pm

I do not think Missouri is wavering as much as the SEC is not committing to them.

by **Ponymon** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:02 pm

http://tinyurl.com/6c23fc5

by **East Coast Mustang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:40 pm

Has EJ's report been completely debunked, or is he going to have a follow-up on that?

by **goldenstang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:42 pm

Ponymon wrote:http://tinyurl.com/6c23fc5

Something is wrong, we aren't on that list.

by **ObeyMyDog** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:43 pm

Or very right?

SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment

Who is online