Page 1 of 2
SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:55 pmby Ponymon
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:07 pmby CalallenStang
That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.
Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:08 pmby smupony94
Code for EJ leaked confidential information about SMU
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:09 pmby ObeyMyDog
That's that real good SEC English
Means they can do whatever the hell they want
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:19 pmby mrydel
CalallenStang wrote:That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering MISSOURI strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.
Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?
Here you go.
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:23 pmby CalallenStang
mrydel wrote:CalallenStang wrote:That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering MISSOURI strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.
Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?
Here you go.
Did you learn how to translate that from living amongst the Hog fans?
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:27 pmby mrydel
Oink
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:39 pmby GRGB
CalallenStang wrote:That doesn't mean Mizzou was not discussed as a potential 14th member, as the SEC certainly is considering strongly among its options, or even that no vote was taken regarding the SEC's intentions.
Can someone please tell me in plain English what the heck the bolded is supposed to mean?
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:44 pmby smubrooks
I believe ther are saying "We're going to pick SMU but nobody will believe us when we say it and everyone in Mizzou might commit suicide so we are holding off for now"
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:56 pmby smupony94
SEC move could generate $12 million a year more for Mizzou
A Missouri move to the SEC could generate as much as $12 million more in annual TV revenue, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press.
Read more:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/f ... z1aPWPh0zK
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:36 pmby mrydel
I do not think Missouri is wavering as much as the SEC is not committing to them.
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:02 pmby Ponymon
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:40 pmby East Coast Mustang
Has EJ's report been completely debunked, or is he going to have a follow-up on that?
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:42 pmby goldenstang
Ponymon wrote:http://tinyurl.com/6c23fc5
Something is wrong, we aren't on that list.
Re: SEC Discusses Re-Alignment
Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:43 pmby ObeyMyDog
Or very right?