PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby Pony^ » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:03 am

"Do you have an FBS football program? Have you ever dreamed of playing in East Hartford in November? The Big East will probably take you."

"Numerous sources across the sport Monday said they can't imagine the marketplace will smile on a league that will essentially be Conference USA circa 2004."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/w ... index.html
Pony^
All-American
 
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:34 pm

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby ponyte » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:10 am

I have always thought the Big East was fortunate to be an AQ conference. It was probably more to do with TV ratings connected to the Northeast than the caliber of football. And as such, the screwy football basketball arrangement certainly created inherently instability in the conference.

All that said, one year in an AQ conference beats the Hades out of what we have dealt with the last few years.
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11216
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby Dutch » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:14 am

no kidding. if nothing else, it's a short term money grab. if it's no different than CUSA, at least we'll get a few extra million for the next 2-3 years.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
User avatar
Dutch
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4377
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: 75205

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby Stallion » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:36 am

but BCS inclusion is only part of the equation. We still would receive benefit of

1) Better Bowls
2) Better Football TV Contract-Money and Visibility
3) Much Better BB TV Contract-Money and Visibility
4) Shot in the arm for BB program to play in nationally elite BB conference
5) Better positioned for next realignment
6) Two years of BCS inclusion
7) we don't have to play in League with watered down members

ITS STILL A NO-BRAINER. Even if Big East lost BCS then this would still be equal to or better than TCU's jump to MWC
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby goldenstang » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:39 am

^ yep
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby RE Tycoon » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:40 am

Stallion wrote:but BCS inclusion is only part of the equation. We still would receive benefit of
1) Better Bowls
2) Better Football TV Contract-Money and Visibility
3) Much Better BB TV Contract-Money and Visibility
4) Shot in the arm for BB program to play in nationally elite BB conference
5) Better positioned for next realignment
6) Two years of BCS inclusion
7) we don't have to play in League with watered down members

ITS STILL A NO-BRAINER


No doubt it's a no-brainer. If by some miracle we win the league for those two years, we look a lot better as a two-time, or even one-time BCS participant when all is said and done and the final shuffle happens.

I hope Mandel is wrong about BE, but I'm afraid he is right.
#NewLobCity
User avatar
RE Tycoon
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby MustangStealth » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:41 am

Stallion wrote:but BCS inclusion is only part of the equation. We still would receive benefit of

1) Better Bowls
2) Better Football TV Contract-Money and Visibility
3) Much Better BB TV Contract-Money and Visibility
4) Shot in the arm for BB program to play in nationally elite BB conference
5) Better positioned for next realignment
6) Two years of BCS inclusion
7) we don't have to play in League with watered down members

ITS STILL A NO-BRAINER. Even if Big East lost BCS then this would still be equal to or better than TCU's jump to MWC


8)Scheduling agreement with Notre Dame, which (if it remains intact) would see us play Notre Dame within 4 years.
User avatar
MustangStealth
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4093
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby westexSMU » Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:54 am

and I just can't see, with all the TV sets in the Northeast, that the Big East will loose their BCS status in the future. It is just not going to happen.
User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby Water Pony » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:03 am

The article's premise is that Boise should not rush to BE just for AQ status, this conference may lose it's AQ.

I submit that that we should move to quality, not a short term opportunity which could evaporate. Either stay put with CUSA/MWC combo or go Indy until a SEC or Big 12 need us and increased access to Dallas, which may be more valuable to SEC.
Pony Up
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5527
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby Water Pony » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:12 am

Asked another way, what next step will put more fans in the seats of Ford Stadium. Either ND calls SO and strongly encourages SMU move to BE (wink, wink) or we commit to SEC that we will expand Ford to 50+ immediately, plus renovate Moody, and host SEC fans in Dallas.
Pony Up
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5527
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby PonyKai » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:14 am

PonyKai
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Here and there.

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby goldenstang » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:35 am

Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:http://outkickthecoverage.com/big-east-unlikely-to-lose-bcs-bid.php


That guy has some very good points.
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: SI: Desparate Big East likely to lose its AQ status

Postby ericdickerson4life » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:37 am

Damn it. Didn't see this posted here.

Well another double post happens...

Interesting read. And if we happen to end up in the BE by chance we better hope he's right.
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests