NYT: Neinas Conflict of Interest?

SMU89 · Post by **SMU89** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:49 am

http://www.smu2bcs.com/news/ny-times-do ... est-issue/

NickSMU17 · Post by **NickSMU17** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:01 am

I knew it...f'ing big 12 and Texas are behind all of this

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:48 am

I am a Texas homer

ericdickerson4life · Post by **ericdickerson4life** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:55 am

All hail our might over lords, Texas Fight!

AustinPerson · Post by **AustinPerson** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:15 am

SMU isn't going to get into the Big 12. Give up. And having SMU's PR firm attacking Neinas really won't help with anyone.

Claiming that somebody has a conflict of interest can be viewed as very offensive to the one who is being attacked. This might backfire down the road.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:35 am

Shhhhh......

This particular conflict of interest works in our favor.

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:41 am

Sure are quite a few Austin people joining up as late. Get ready to start hearing from me about joining or participating in Austin MC events.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:42 am

Happy hours are not supposed to include marijuana.

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:43 am

so you're a shill for the athletic department now?

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:46 am

Dutch wrote:so you're a shill for the athletic department now?

Yes, I am now part of the marketing problem

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:47 am

ponyboy wrote:Happy hours are not supposed to include marijuana.

We are actively recruiting Willie Nelson as a spokesperson

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:48 am

AustinPerson wrote:SMU isn't going to get into the Big 12. Give up. And having SMU's PR firm attacking Neinas really won't help with anyone.

Claiming that somebody has a conflict of interest can be viewed as very offensive to the one who is being attacked. This might backfire down the road.

It's not SMU's PR firm attacking Neinas...they just reprinted an independent article.

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:49 am

right, but reprinting, or even providing a link condones it.

Bergermeister · Post by **Bergermeister** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:52 am

Dutch wrote:right, but reprinting, or even providing a link condones it.

exactly.

NickSMU17 · Post by **NickSMU17** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:56 am

It is a conflict on interest guy is working on behalf of 2 conferences, and trying to kill another...