
Thought this was a pretty impressive facility for a D3 school... Also have plans to add an IPF in the near future.
|
UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium![]() Thought this was a pretty impressive facility for a D3 school... Also have plans to add an IPF in the near future.
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumWTF is the NOTS BC I DO NOT NO
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
?
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumThe tall multi-deck look feeks bigger than flat. Thats Ford's problem. Looks small time
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
Correct. I love Ford but it's not tall enough. Compare it to USM's stadium which is roughly the same size (capacity is 36,000): ![]() Of course, we have city codes to blame for that...but there's no reason why the east side can't be as tall as the west side press box. We need to seat more people on the east side than we do, for TV purposes.
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
I agree SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumI agree with you couchem and calallen... This stadium looks big but holds less than 10K
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumUSM is a great stadium and feels big. One level doesnt at all
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumDitto. See Wyomings stadium. Holds in the 20s I think.
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
Haha. GRGB, you ok?
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumTall stadiums have more quality seats also. Ford has tons of garbage seats.
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
I feel that some of y'all on this forum are delusional. Our stadium is fine for our size and quite beautiful. We don't need to expand due to our student population level and because of our current attendance. SMU doesn't need an IPF. While it is a nice luxury to have, it isn't necessary. The reason why we don't have a better recruiting class isn't because we don't have an IPF. When the university does get one, it shouldn't replace the where the current track/soccer stadium is currently located. The soccer stadium is aesthetically pleasing due to its location, students from the new dorms can view their classmates. An IPF will just be an ugly box that you cannot view inside well. If we do get one, it should either be off campus or maybe where the practice field is currently located. Not to be too confrontational, but what is some of the posters' fascination with expanding the stadium? If you can't even fill the seats consistently, why expand? I definitely agree that a double decker stadium looks better, but I think our stadium is great for our size. We should look at people that SMU wants to emulate. Stanford reduced the size of their stadium in order to better fit their student body population. Stanford is bigger, in a power 5, and has an endowment of about 17 billion. In addition, Vanderbilt's stadium isn't that large even though it is in the SEC. See also Northwestern, Wake Forest, etc. While I understand that this is a football forum, the best way we can help SMU is donating, attending games, and demanding that the current/future coach's emphasizes recruiting.
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumYou are delusional if you think we are talking about a bigger stadium. We are talking about a taller stadium, which does not necessarily mean bigger.
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football Stadium
Ok I will try. WTF (we all know this one) NOTS..Here I am a little confused but perhaps "nature of this shot" or something along those lines. BC... I DO NOT NO...because...I do not know. ?????? All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: UMHB (Div 3) Football StadiumTranslation (thank you mrydel): "What the possum is the nature of this disrespect of Division III football stadiums because I am unaware of the reason why someone would disrespect Division III football stadiums."
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
|