Page 1 of 2
SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:40 pm
by BigT3x
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcsSMU (#90) is below:
Houston (#31)
TCU (#49)
Rice (#54)
Tulane (#62)
North Texas (#72)
Texas State (#87)
Are SMU officials discussing a plan to address this? This little caring about football experiment that we started a few years ago is in the ditch. Does it end here or do we get more money for the next level coaching upgrade?
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:41 pm
by CenTXpony
Cool.
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:02 am
by Big Hoss
That high, eh?
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:32 am
by SMU_Alumni11
I feel bad for the teams behind us. I mean we are dealing with a coach who literally calls his OOC games "preseason" and cant seem to get his team under his 6th year ready for the regular season games. Also he doesn't recruit and only has success when its prior coaches recruits...
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:04 am
by Lebanese4Life
we've become a joke
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:32 am
by mrydel
It is the fault of we old people!!
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:06 am
by GRGB
BigT3x wrote:http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs
SMU (#90) is below:
Houston (#31)
TCU (#49)
Rice (#54)
Tulane (#62)
North Texas (#72)
Texas State (#87)
Are SMU officials discussing a plan to address this? This little caring about football experiment that we started a few years ago is in the ditch. Does it end here or do we get more money for the next level coaching upgrade?
a 1-4 record will do that to you.
Note: we have played the #4 hardest schedule in FBS (though last week), 6th this week
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:18 am
by GRGB
So, you're sayin' there's a chance!
SAGARIN
32 Central Florida (Home finale)
56 at Houston (backup QB?)
70 Cincy (lost to S. Fla this week)
94 SMU A = 64.39 1 4 76.97( 6) 0 1 | 0 3 | 64.67 96 | 63.96 93
102 at Memphis A = 62.80 1 4 67.26( 63) 0 0 | 0 0 | 61.83 107 | 63.64 95
115 South Florida (home) A = 59.88 2 4 68.05( 53) 0 0 | 0 2 | 61.35 108 | 58.27 122
122 Connecticut (home) A = 58.74 0 5 67.72( 60) 0 0 | 0 0 | 58.86 125 | 58.45 120
143 Temple (home) A = 55.73 0 6 69.89( 42) 0 1 | 0 1 | 55.05 143 | 56.24 140
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:28 am
by Mustangs_Maroons
GRGB wrote:So, you're sayin' there's a chance!
SAGARIN
32 Central Florida (Home finale)
56 at Houston (backup QB?)
70 Cincy (lost to S. Fla this week)
94 SMU A = 64.39 1 4 76.97( 6) 0 1 | 0 3 | 64.67 96 | 63.96 93
102 at Memphis A = 62.80 1 4 67.26( 63) 0 0 | 0 0 | 61.83 107 | 63.64 95
115 South Florida (home) A = 59.88 2 4 68.05( 53) 0 0 | 0 2 | 61.35 108 | 58.27 122
122 Connecticut (home) A = 58.74 0 5 67.72( 60) 0 0 | 0 0 | 58.86 125 | 58.45 120
143 Temple (home) A = 55.73 0 6 69.89( 42) 0 1 | 0 1 | 55.05 143 | 56.24 140
This is very interesting. I view the game against Memphis as a lose-lose for us. If we win, we gain no credibility. If we lose, we drop even lower. For whatever June did at the beginning of his tenure, he's eroding all of it with his current disinterest for being the football coach at SMU.
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:55 am
by StallionsModelT
We've come full circle. Thanks June!
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:55 am
by PK
StallionsModelT wrote:We've come full circle. Thanks June!
Well at least he loves his players. It is often questionable whether or not he has any love for SMU and its small group of loyal fans.
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:01 am
by Mustangs_Maroons
I think we can all fairly assume he loves his $2mm/annual paycheck for doing little to no recruiting and running off of a system he ran in the 1980s. Talk about bang for your buck. Too bad it's on SMU's dime, and the real cost (as well as opportunity cost) for not acting sooner will be painfully felt by these few loyal fans, SMU alums as a whole, and to a certain extent you could argue as well as the city of Dallas (with SMU as the only D1 program in the city).
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:21 am
by CA Mustang
GRGB wrote:So, you're sayin' there's a chance!
SAGARIN
32 Central Florida (Home finale)
56 at Houston (backup QB?)
70 Cincy (lost to S. Fla this week)
94 SMU A = 64.39 1 4 76.97( 6) 0 1 | 0 3 | 64.67 96 | 63.96 93
102 at Memphis A = 62.80 1 4 67.26( 63) 0 0 | 0 0 | 61.83 107 | 63.64 95
115 South Florida (home) A = 59.88 2 4 68.05( 53) 0 0 | 0 2 | 61.35 108 | 58.27 122
122 Connecticut (home) A = 58.74 0 5 67.72( 60) 0 0 | 0 0 | 58.86 125 | 58.45 120
143 Temple (home) A = 55.73 0 6 69.89( 42) 0 1 | 0 1 | 55.05 143 | 56.24 140
Actually, USF is a road game.
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:24 am
by PonyKai
Guys, guys...once the squad learns the intricacies of the Run N Shoot...it's a complex offense...we're going to be unstoppable. Please have some patience!
Re: SMU #90 in Projected BCS Standings

Posted:
Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:15 am
by Dukie
PK wrote:StallionsModelT wrote:We've come full circle. Thanks June!
Well at least he loves his players. It is often questionable whether or not he has any love for SMU and its small group of loyal fans.
I am tempted to say it is not questionable, in that all of the evidence tends toward "no." Except for the counterpoint of him telling LB that SMU is a great place. That really happened, right?