RyanSMU98 wrote:1980, operating under the validity of your source, is it safe to assume then that some sort of a plan is developing regarding how to actually move forward? Not expecting details of course, I'll just sleep better knowing that the people that matter are actually getting their ducks in a row to make legitimate progress and not just reacting to the disappointment that has been the tail end of JJ's tenure. Hopefully I'll see some of y'all at the game Saturday; I'll be there plus 3.
I think the conservatives on the COC have been moved from their perch. These are people with substantial experience in making good business judgments. We have all made mistakes in business and perhaps this was one of them - who knows? I think everyone has been disappointed by the performance, however he did turn the program around. The death penalty and the scandal continue to haunt everyone's decision making.
Many want to ensure SMU conducts itself with the highest ethical standards and is not seen as a football crazy school. Having said this, I believe the Larry Brown experience has given them the impetus for change and the excuse. SMU must go in the right direction without being seen as firing a man who unquestionably turned around a moribund football program. JJ is a good man, he just has professional limitations. I am certain he is gone at the end of the season. The joker in the deck is whether or not he goes without making a mess. I understand his agent is out trying to sell the story that it is all SMU's problem and not JJ's. Well, what do you expect from an agent.
Will they exceed my expectations? I hope so. I am confident the COC understands the critical importance of taking SMU football to a higher level so that SMU may benefit from the long term potential financial benefits.
I am sure they wanted this leaked to flush out JJ. I am not the first to learn of this.