mustangxc wrote:If SMU continues to rise in basketball, Houston has a steady climb, and UCONN/Memphis/Cincinnati/Temple maintain themselves then we will likely maintain if not surpass that amount in TV revenue the next time we sign a deal. Hopefully, UCF and Houston can consistently achieve the success they are having in football this season and SMU/Cincinnati/USF improve dramatically to add to that first tier while UCONN/Temple/Memphis rise enough to become respectable programs.
AAC would still be the 6th best conference, in other words take back the spot Big East had. The TV deal will be significantly larger (maybe get close to $8-10million per school). Problem is, lots of the schools are at the bottom of the totem pole in their respective markets/areas, which is why I don't see a BCS berth or lots of money a la Big 12 style in the AAC, EVER.
SMU and Houston are overshadowed by other Texas teams in other conferences (SEC, Big 12)
UCF and USF are overshadowed by Florida State, Florida, Miami
Cincinnati by Ohio State and regional schools like Notre Dame and Michigan
Memphis has Tennessee in the SEC
Tulsa....OU, OK State
East Carolina....NC Tar heels, NC State, SC Gamecocks
Temple...okay they have Philly but still Penn State takes lion's share
They will be at the bottom of the food chain in terms of TV exposure, even if we had SMU, Houston, UCF, Cincy, USF in the Top 25 AP polls...those other schools are simply the rulers and I find it hard that the NCAA will let the conference have a spot in the automatic berths. Funny how Notre Dame has one and the AAC won't ...